Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent

Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):166-169 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Julian Savulescu has given clear expression to a principle—that of “procreative beneficence”—which underlies the thought of many contemporary writers on bioethics. The principle of procreative beneficence holds that parents or single reproducers are at least prima facie obliged to select the child, out of a range of possible children they might have, who will be likely to lead the best life. My aim in this paper is to argue that prospective parents, just by dint of their being prospective parents, are in fact not obliged to act on PPB. That is, there is something about their filling the role of prospective parents that exempts them from selecting the child with the best life. I urge that it is more realistic to view prospective parents as bound by a principle of acceptable outlook, which holds that they ought not to select children whose lives will contain an unacceptable amount of suffering

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Procreative beneficence – cui Bono?Jakob Elster - 2009 - Bioethics 25 (9):482-488.
In defence of Procreative Beneficence.J. Savulescu - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):284-288.
The best possible child.M. Parker - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):279-283.
Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (3):43-59.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
122 (#180,512)

6 months
13 (#248,406)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Herissone-Kelly
University of Central Lancashire

Citations of this work

Imposing a Lifestyle: A New Argument for Antinatalism.Matti Häyry & Amanda Sukenick - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (2):238-259.
Harming as causing harm.Elizabeth Harman - 2009 - In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts (eds.), Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 137--154.
Impairing the Impairment Argument.Kyle van Oosterum & Emma J. Curran - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):335-339.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations