Procreative beneficence and in vitro gametogenesis

Monash Bioethics Review 30 (2):29-48 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PB) holds that when a couple plans to have a child, they have significant moral reason to select, of the possible children they could have, the child who is most likely to experience the greatest wellbeing – that is, the most advantaged child, the child with the best chance at the best life.1 PB captures the common sense intuitions of many about reproductive decisions. PB does not posit an absolute moral obligation – it does not dictate what people must do. Instead it holds that there is a significant moral reason to select the best child, but one that must be weighed against other reasons.Recent research suggests that it may become possible to derive gametes (eggs and sperm) from human stem cells in vitro, a process which we will term in vitro gametogenesis (IVG). The ability to create large numbers of eggs or sperm through IVG greatly increases our capacity to select the best child possible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Procreative Beneficence and Genome Editing.Robert Ranisch - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):20-22.
Procreative beneficence – cui Bono?Jakob Elster - 2009 - Bioethics 25 (9):482-488.
Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent.P. Herissone-Kelly - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):166-169.
The best possible child.M. Parker - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):279-283.
In defence of Procreative Beneficence.J. Savulescu - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):284-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-30

Downloads
74 (#284,474)

6 months
8 (#597,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?