- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On Performance-Enhancing Substances and the Unfair Advantage Argument
Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 16 (1):59-73 (1989)
Abstract
No abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Performance-Enhancing Substances in Sport: An Ethical Study.Roger William Gardner - 1990 - Dissertation, Purdue University
Promoting Fairness in Sport through Performance-enhancing Substances: An Argument for Why Sport Referees Ought to ‘Be on Drugs’.Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Francisco Javier Lopez Frias - 2020 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (2):199-207.
Why Olympic Athletes Should Avoid the Use and Seek the Elimination of Performance-Enhancing Substances and Practices From the Olympic Games.Angela J. Schneider & Robert R. Butcher - 1993 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 20 (1):64-81.
Drugs in Sport, the Straight Dope: A Philosophical Analysis of the Justification for Banning Performance-Enhancing Substances and Practices in the Olympic Games.Angela Jo-Anne Schneider - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Well Played: A Christian Theology of Sport and the Ethics of Doping.Michael Shafer - 2015 - Eugene, Oregon: Lutterworth.
The Coercion Argument Against Performance-Enhancing Drugs.Michael Veber - 2014 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 41 (2):267-277.
Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Sport: The Ethical Issue.Warren P. Fraleigh - 1984 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 11 (1):23-28.
Doping, Debunking, and Drawing the Line.Eric Gilbertson - 2020 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (2):160-184.
Rethinking the unfair advantage argument.Tena Thau - 2021 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48 (1):63-81.
The Ethics of Performance-Enhancing Technology in Sport.Sigmund Loland - 2009 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36 (2):152-161.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
157 (#150,482)
6 months
12 (#218,371)
2013-11-24
Downloads
157 (#150,482)
6 months
12 (#218,371)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Coping with Doping.J. Corlett, Vincent Brown Jr & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
Reframing the Debate over Performance-Enhancing Drugs: The Reasonable Athlete Argument.Matthew C. Altman - 2023 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-14.
Coping with Doping.J. Angelo Corlett, Vincent Brown & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
“Aretism” and Pharmacological Ergogenic Aids in Sport: Taking a Shot at the Use of Steroids.M. Andrew Holowchak - 2000 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1):35-50.
Fairness and Performance Enhancement in Sport.Craig L. Carr - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35 (2):193-207.
References found in this work
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
Blood Doping and Athletic Competition.Clifton Perry - 1983 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (3):39-45.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-gv576 uwo