Coping with Doping

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We provide a new wrinkle to the Argument from Unfair Advantage, a rather popular one in the ethics of doping in sports discussions. But we add a new argument that we believe places the moral burden on those who favor doping in sports. We also defend our position against some important concerns that might be raised against it. In the end, we argue that for the time being, doping in sports ought to be banned until it can be demonstrated that our concerns can be satisfied.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
101 (#208,725)

6 months
8 (#574,086)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. Angelo Corlett
San Diego State University

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
The law of peoples.John Rawls - 1999 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by John Rawls.
The Case Against Perfection.Michael J. Sandel - 2004 - The Atlantic (April):1–11.

View all 22 references / Add more references