Perfect trees and elementary embeddings

Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (3):906-918 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An important technique in large cardinal set theory is that of extending an elementary embedding j: M → N between inner models to an elementary embedding j*: M[G] → N[G*] between generic extensions of them. This technique is crucial both in the study of large cardinal preservation and of internal consistency. In easy cases, such as when forcing to make the GCH hold while preserving a measurable cardinal (via a reverse Easton iteration of α-Cohen forcing for successor cardinals α), the generic G* is simply generated by the image of G. But in difficult cases, such as in Woodin's proof that a hypermeasurable is sufficient to obtain a failure of the GCH at a measurable, a preliminary version of G* must be constructed (possibly in a further generic extension of M[G]) and then modified to provide the required G*. In this article we use perfect trees to reduce some difficult cases to easy ones, using fusion as a substitute for distributivity. We apply our technique to provide a new proof of Woodin's theorem as well as the new result that global domination at inaccessibles (the statement that d (κ) is less than 2κ for inaccessible κ, where d (κ) is the dominating number at κ) is internally consistent, given the existence of 0#

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Easton’s theorem and large cardinals.Sy-David Friedman & Radek Honzik - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 154 (3):191-208.
The number of normal measures.Sy-David Friedman & Menachem Magidor - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (3):1069-1080.
Large cardinals and large dilators.Andy Lewis - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1496-1510.
Spector forcing.J. M. Henle - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (2):542-554.
Tall cardinals.Joel D. Hamkins - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (1):68-86.
Global singularization and the failure of SCH.Radek Honzik - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (7):895-915.
Weakly measurable cardinals.Jason A. Schanker - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (3):266-280.
Ramsey-like cardinals.Victoria Gitman - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):519 - 540.
Iterated extended ultrapowers and supercompactness without choice.Mitchell Spector - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 54 (2):179-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
67 (#333,026)

6 months
13 (#221,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Easton’s theorem and large cardinals.Sy-David Friedman & Radek Honzik - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 154 (3):191-208.
Fusion and large cardinal preservation.Sy-David Friedman, Radek Honzik & Lyubomyr Zdomskyy - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (12):1247-1273.
Easton’s theorem in the presence of Woodin cardinals.Brent Cody - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):569-591.
A Laver-like indestructibility for hypermeasurable cardinals.Radek Honzik - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (3-4):275-287.
Global singularization and the failure of SCH.Radek Honzik - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (7):895-915.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from o(K)=K++.Moti Gitik - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (3):209-234.
Perfect-set forcing for uncountable cardinals.Akihiro Kanamori - 1980 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 19 (1-2):97-114.
Cardinal invariants above the continuum.James Cummings & Saharon Shelah - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (3):251-268.
Minimal α-degrees.Richard A. Shore - 1972 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 4 (4):393-414.

Add more references