Easton’s theorem in the presence of Woodin cardinals

Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):569-591 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Under the assumption that δ is a Woodin cardinal and GCH holds, I show that if F is any class function from the regular cardinals to the cardinals such that (1) ${\kappa < {\rm cf}(F(\kappa))}$ , (2) ${\kappa < \lambda}$ implies ${F(\kappa) \leq F(\lambda)}$ , and (3) δ is closed under F, then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which 2 γ = F(γ) for each regular cardinal γ < δ, and in which δ remains Woodin. Unlike the analogous results for supercompact cardinals [Menas in Trans Am Math Soc 223:61–91, (1976)] and strong cardinals [Friedman and Honzik in Ann Pure Appl Logic 154(3):191–208, (2008)], there is no requirement that the function F be locally definable. I deduce a global version of the above result: Assuming GCH, if F is a function satisfying (1) and (2) above, and C is a class of Woodin cardinals, each of which is closed under F, then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which 2 γ = F(γ) for all regular cardinals γ and each cardinal in C remains Woodin

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Easton’s theorem and large cardinals.Sy-David Friedman & Radek Honzik - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 154 (3):191-208.
Global singularization and the failure of SCH.Radek Honzik - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (7):895-915.
The internal consistency of Easton’s theorem.Sy-David Friedman & Pavel Ondrejovič - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 156 (2):259-269.
Extender based forcings.Moti Gitik & Menachem Magidor - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):445-460.
Patterns of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 89 (2-3):101-115.
Weak Indestructibility and Reflection.James Holland - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):980-1006.
Strong Compactness, Square, Gch, and Woodin Cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):1180-1188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
56 (#382,832)

6 months
9 (#475,977)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Large cardinals need not be large in HOD.Yong Cheng, Sy-David Friedman & Joel David Hamkins - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (11):1186-1198.
Easton's theorem for the tree property below ℵ.Šárka Stejskalová - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (7):102974.
Woodin for strong compactness cardinals.Stamatis Dimopoulos - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (1):301-319.
An Easton like theorem in the presence of Shelah cardinals.Mohammad Golshani - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (3-4):273-287.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
Perfect-set forcing for uncountable cardinals.Akihiro Kanamori - 1980 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 19 (1-2):97-114.
Cardinal invariants above the continuum.James Cummings & Saharon Shelah - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (3):251-268.
Perfect trees and elementary embeddings.Sy-David Friedman & Katherine Thompson - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (3):906-918.

View all 10 references / Add more references