Thomson on distress

Ethics 106 (1):112-119 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Judith Jarvis Thomson holds that we have a right not be be caused distressful feelingsÑbut only if they are "non-belief- mediated"; we have no right not to be caused belief-mediated distress. I suggest that this view is highly counter-intuitive; and I argue that it is not supported by Thomson's arguments which, if they serve to exclude belief-mediated feelings would equally serve to exclude non-belief-mediated ones. I also suggest that some of the work that Thomson wants this distinction to do can be done in other ways.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#321,620)

6 months
13 (#242,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Harm, sovereignty, and prohibition.Victor Tadros - 2011 - Legal Theory 17 (1):35-65.
Virtual killing.Carl David Https://Orcidorg191X Mildenberger - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (1):185-203.
A Liberal Theory of Commodification.Carl David Https://Orcidorg191X Mildenberger - 2024 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 38 (1-2):1-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references