The ethics of social honeypots

Research Ethics 11 (4):192-210 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers some of the ethical issues surrounding the study of malicious activity in social networks, specifically using a technique known as social honeypots combined with the use of deception. This is a potentially touchy area of study that is common to social and behavioral research that is well understood to fall within the boundaries of human subjects research that is regulated in the United States and reviewed by institutional review boards, but is not well understood by computer security researchers or those in the private sector. The firestorm of controversy over the 2014 “emotional contagion” study of Facebook users shows that learning about being deceived may itself be the harm, to both those users involved and their trust in researchers and research in general. Should researchers have an obligation to try to find research methods that do not involve deception to achieve the same research results?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Facebook Study: A Little Bit Unethical But Worth It?John Kleinsman & Sue Buckley - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):179-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-04

Downloads
22 (#969,010)

6 months
4 (#1,246,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks.A. D. I. Kramer, J. E. Guillory & J. T. Hancock - 2014 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111.

Add more references