Bradley's utilitarian theory of punishment

Ethics 86 (3):200-213 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although f h bradley is usually taken to be a retributivist, His writings on the topic of punishment show his position to be more utilitarian. And he criticizes retributivism severely in his article in the "international journal of ethics" in 1894. The present paper attempts to present a more accurate picture of bradley's views of punishment and to show the relevance of these views to contemporary debate on the justification and distribution of punishment

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Bradley a retributivist?Thom Brooks - 2011 - History of Political Thought 32 (1):83-95.
Montesquieu's philosophy of punishment.D. Carrithers - 1998 - History of Political Thought 19 (2):213-240.
Making sense of retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Is Hegel a Retributivist?Thom Brooks - 2004 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 25 (1-2):113-126.
Punishment and Moral Sentiments.Thom Brooks - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (2):281-93.
German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment.Jean-Christophe Merle - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#334,501)

6 months
14 (#219,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references