The sum rule has not been tested

Philosophy of Science 44 (1):107-112 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate between Glymour and Fine hinges in part on a comparison of the width of the incoming wave packet in momentum space with the angles intercepted by the detectors in the Cross-Ramsey experiment. As Fine argues, it follows from the quantum formalism that the initial dispersion will be conserved in Compton scattering, and he allows that the Sum Rule is constrained by the statistical results of quantum mechanics. The Sum Rule may fail, but it will not fail in any way that violates quantum mechanics. Thus most of the time the individual momentum value does not change more than the width of the initial wave packet: usually the value of Qγe at t must equal the value of Qγ at t′ plus the value of Qe at t′ ± Δp/2, where Δp represents the dispersion in momentum for the initial gamma ray. Thus in order to refute Fine's thesis, the detectors must discriminate finely enough to pick out changeovers of individual values within Δp.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Experimental tests of the sum rule.M. L. G. Redhead - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):50-64.
The sum rule is well-confirmed.Clark Glymour - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):86-94.
Uncertainty principle and uncertainty relations.J. B. M. Uffink & Jan Hilgevoord - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (9):925–944.
Conservation, the sum rule and confirmation.Arthur Fine - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):95-106.
Losing energy in classical, relativistic and quantum mechanics.David Atkinson - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):170-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#612,504)

6 months
17 (#176,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Cartwright
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

Quantum realism: Naïveté is no excuse.Richard Healey - 1979 - Synthese 42 (1):121 - 144.
Experimental tests of the sum rule.M. L. G. Redhead - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):50-64.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The sum rule is well-confirmed.Clark Glymour - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):86-94.
Conservation, the sum rule and confirmation.Arthur Fine - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):95-106.

Add more references