- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Experimental tests of the sum rule
Philosophy of Science 48 (1):50-64 (1981)
Abstract
Recent discussions of experimental tests of the Sum Rule have been carried out in the context of the special circumstances attending the Cross-Ramsey experiment. A more general analysis of possible tests is presented. A technical mistake of Fine and Glymour concerned with a misunderstanding of the physics of the Cross-Ramsey experiment is explained and a detailed analysis of a thought experiment based on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen wave function is given. It is concluded, in agreement with Fine, that scattering experiments do not test the Sum Rule as a principle which supplements standard quantum mechanicsAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Separable hidden variables theory to explain Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
On the Conclusive Tests of Local Realism and Pseudoscalar Mesons.Marco Genovese, Carlo Novero & Enrico Predazzi - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (4):589-605.
Objectivity vs. Locality in Quantum Physics.Ernst-Walther Stachow - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1450-1475.
Transitions to the Continuum: Three Different Approaches.M. E. Burgos - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (10):883-907.
The physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.B. H. Kellett - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):735-757.
A Bell Experiment Under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions.Gregor Weihs, Thomas Jennewein, Christoph Simon, Harald Weinfurter & Anton Zeilinger - 1999 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 7:267-269.
Quantum Theory and Theology.Rodney D. Holder - 2012 - In J. B. Stump & Alan G. Padgett (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 220-230.
Afshar’s Experiment Does Not Show a Violation of Complementarity.Ole Steuernagel - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (9):1370-1385.
The roles of one thought experiment in interpreting quantum mechanics. Werner Heisenberg meets Thomas Kuhn.Maarten van Dyck - 2003 - Philosophica 72 (3):79-103.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
53 (#408,867)
6 months
14 (#227,991)
2009-01-28
Downloads
53 (#408,867)
6 months
14 (#227,991)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Nonlocality and the Kochen-Specker paradox.Peter Heywood & Michael L. G. Redhead - 1983 - Foundations of Physics 13 (5):481-499.
Models and methodologies in current theoretical high-energy physics.James T. Cushing - 1982 - Synthese 50 (1):5 - 101.
References found in this work
The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.Simon Kochen & E. P. Specker - 1967 - Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17:59--87.
Algebraic constraints on hidden variables.Arthur Fine & Paul Teller - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (7-8):629-636.
Quantum-theoretical realism: Popper and Einstein V. kochen and Specker.Michael R. Gardner - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):13-23.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-6qn2c uwo