The importance of primary care for theoretical medicine: A commentary

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (3) (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Froom and Froom all attention to referral bias as a frequent cause for misinterpreting the medical literature. This is particularly a source of false certainty, and therefore false science, in U.S. practice, where referral centers are often seen as the only legitimate source of medical knowledge and where primary care is discounted as a source of scientific observations. Appreciation of the primary care setting is therefore a critical element in theoretical understanding of medical epistemology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Professional ethics and primary care medicine: beyond dilemmas and decorum.Harmon L. Smith - 1986 - Durham: Duke University Press. Edited by Larry R. Churchill.
Conscience, Disobedience, and Standard of Care.Stephen R. Latham - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (4):10-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
16 (#1,276,023)

6 months
16 (#186,219)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references