Experiential knowledge in clinical medicine: use and justification

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 41 (2):67-82 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Within the evidence-based medicine construct, clinical expertise is acknowledged to be both derived from primary experience and necessary for optimal medical practice. Primary experience in medical practice, however, remains undervalued. Clinicians’ primary experience tends to be dismissed by EBM as unsystematic or anecdotal, a source of bias rather than knowledge, never serving as the “best” evidence to support a clinical decision. The position that clinical expertise is necessary but that primary experience is untrustworthy in clinical decision-making is epistemically incoherent. Here we argue for the value and utility of knowledge gained from primary experience for the practice of medicine. Primary experience provides knowledge necessary to diagnose, treat, and assess response in individual patients. Hierarchies of evidence, when advanced as guides for clinical decisions, mistake the relationship between propositional and experiential knowledge. We argue that primary experience represents a kind of medical knowledge distinct from the propositional knowledge produced by clinical research, both of which are crucial to determining the best diagnosis and course of action for particular patients.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recognizing tacit knowledge in medical epistemology.Stephen G. Henry - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):187--213.
Whither our art? Clinical wisdom and evidence-based medicine.Malcolm Parker - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):273-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-24

Downloads
90 (#240,824)

6 months
17 (#151,358)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mark R. Tonelli
University of Washington
Devora Shapiro
Ohio University

Citations of this work

Against ‘instantaneous’ expertise.Alexander Mebius - 2022 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 17 (1):1-6.

Add more citations