Judicial activism, immigration and the one-child case

Abstract

Changes to administrative law in Australia have increased the access of non-residents to Australia’s legal system. Governments have recently sought to limit the impact of this access by restricting the courts’ decision-making freedom. The recent High Court’s judgment on a refugee claim based on China’s one-child family policy illustrates the dilemmas involved.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,170

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

'Streamlining' the rule of law: How the department of justice is undermining judicial review of agency action.Shruti Rana - manuscript
Restricting Access to ART on the Basis of Criminal Record: An Ethical Analysis of a State-Enforced “Presumption Against Treatment” With Regard to Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Kara Thompson & Rosalind McDougall - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):511-520.
Building a Fair Future: Transforming Immigration Policy for Refugees and Families.Matthew J. Lister - 2024 - In Matteo Bonotti & Narelle Miragliotta, Australian Politics at a Crossroads: Prospects for Change. Routledge. pp. 149-16`.
The Politics of “Doing Exactly Nothing”: Feminist Legal Change and Bureaucratic Administration of Refugee Protection.Azar Masoumi - 2019 - Feminist Legal Studies 27 (3):243-261.
Trybunalskie i sądowe stosowanie zasady „ignorantia iuris nocet” na gruncie praktyki orzeczniczej w Polsce.Tomasz Woś - 2018 - Filozofia Publiczna I Edukacja Demokratyczna 7 (1):181-205.
The Rights of Families and Children at the Border.Matthew J. Lister - 2018 - In Elizabeth Brake & Lucinda Ferguson, Philosophical Foundations of Children's and Family Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 153-170.
Feminist Activism, Third Party Interventions and the Courts.Harriet Samuels - 2005 - Feminist Legal Studies 13 (1):15-42.
Reflexive Understanding of the Concept of a Spouse – Comments on the Impact of the Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Coman and Others on the Rulings of Administrative Courts.Bartosz Wojciechowski & Anna Chmielarz-Grochal - 2023 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 68 (1):99-121.
Mature minors and gender dysphoria: a matter for clinicians not courts.John McMillan & Colin Gavaghan - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (11):717-718.
‘I Am Responsible’: Histories of the Intersection of the Guardianship of Unaccompanied Child Refugees and the Australian Border.Jordana Silverstein - 2016 - Cultural Studies Review 22 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-19

Downloads
3 (#1,882,136)

6 months
3 (#1,181,891)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references