Literariness: models, gradations, experiments

New York: Peter Lang. Edited by Soren A. Gauger (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The deepest crises cannot destroy the universal model of literariness. It maintains its appeal for participants in literary communication as a -contradictory- model. This thought recurs in many epochs. Literariness involves suspending the formal or logical norms of contradiction ("lex contraditionis"). In everyday speech, it is not permissible for -A- to simultaneously be -not-A-; in literary structures this is the norm. This is both in the ideas, and in the tensions between the artificiality and naturalness of speech, the structure and the chaos of the plot, experimentation and revitalization of tradition, objective observation and a biased vision of the world, its visibility and invisibility, expressibility and inexpressibility, and a realistic and an imaginative focus. Executions of this model are gradative."

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Translating Literariness: A Cognitive Poetic Account.Yanchun Zhao - 2017 - Journal of Human Cognition 2 (1):18-29.
Derrida's singularity : literature and ethics.Derek Attridge - 2008 - In Simon Glendinning & Robert Eaglestone (eds.), Derrida's Legacies: Literature and Philosophy. New York: Routledge.
Philosophical Aspects of Literary Objectiveness.Endre Kiss - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:77-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-10

Downloads
6 (#1,696,700)

6 months
2 (#1,687,048)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references