Weak and Post completeness in the Hilbert school

Humanities Journal of Valparaiso 14:449-466 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to clarify why propositional logic is Post complete and its weak completeness was almost unnoticed by Hilbert and Bernays, while first-order logic is Post incomplete and its weak completeness was seen as an open problem by Hilbert and Ackermman. Thus, I will compare propositional and first-order logic in the Prinzipien der Mathematik, Bernays’s second Habilitationsschrift and the Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik. The so called “arithmetical interpretation”, the conjunctive and disjunctive normal forms and the soundness of the propositional rules of inference deserve special emphasis.

Other Versions

reprint Aranda, Víctor (2019) "Weak and Post completeness in the Hilbert school". Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 14():449-466

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-30

Downloads
10 (#1,466,946)

6 months
3 (#1,471,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
From Frege to Gödel.Jean Van Heijenoort (ed.) - 1967 - Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.
Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik.D. Hilbert & W. Ackermann - 1928 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 7:157-157.
From Frege to Gödel.Jean van Heijenoort - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (1):72-72.
A Survey of Symbolic Logic.C. I. Lewis - 1918 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 17 (3):78-79.

View all 9 references / Add more references