A Critical Comment on Collste

Public Health Ethics 4 (2):203-205 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article claims that the account of specification as a way to solve conflicts between rights, suggested by Göran Collste, is unsatisfactory. It is argued that specification is not a solution on its own, but is better described as a remedy in response to a political failure

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-15

Downloads
66 (#323,074)

6 months
13 (#272,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcus Agnafors
Linkoping University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rescuing Justice and Equality.G. A. Cohen (ed.) - 2008 - Harvard University Press.
Subject index.G. A. Cohen - 2008 - In Rescuing Justice and Equality. Harvard University Press. pp. 425-430.
Specifying Rights: the Case of TRIPS.G. Collste - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (1):63-69.

Add more references