Results for 'freedom of will'

951 found
Order:
  1. (2 other versions)Freedom of Will.N. Lossky - 1933 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 40 (1):10-10.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  3
    Freedom of will.Nikolaĭ Onufrievich Losskiĭ - 1932 - London,: Williams & Norgate. Edited by Natalie Duddington.
  3.  69
    Freedom of Will and the Value of Choice.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):256-284.
    Many argue that our reasons to value choice do not depend on our having libertarian free will.The paper argues against this view. One reason to value choice is that it is constitutive of a life of self-determination. If choices are determined, however, they can be predicted and brought about by others; and if choices are randomly indeterministic, they can be mimicked. In either case, the importance of choice to self-determination is challenged. Thus, it is only as long as our (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  4. (2 other versions)Freedom of Will and Freedom of Action.Rogers Albritton - 1982 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free will. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 239-251.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  5. (1 other version)Locke on the Freedom of Will.Vere Chappell - 1994 - In Graham Alan John Rogers (ed.), Locke's philosophy: content and context. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 101--21.
    Locke was a libertarian: he believed in human freedom. To be sure, his conception of freedom was different from that of many philosophers who call themselves libertarians. Some such philosophers maintain that an agent is free only if her action is uncaused; whereas Locke thought that all actions have causes, including the free ones. Some libertarians hold that no action is free unless it proceeds from a volition that is itself free; whereas Locke argued that free volition, as (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6. Indoctrination, coercion and freedom of will.Gideon Yaffe - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):335–356.
    Manipulation by another person often undermines freedom. To explain this, a distinction is drawn between two forms of manipulation: indoctrination is defined as causing another person to respond to reasons in a pattern that serves the manipulator’s ends; coercion as supplying another person with reasons that, given the pattern in which he responds to reasons, lead him to act in ways that serve the manipulator’s ends. It is argued that both forms of manipulation undermine freedom because manipulators track (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  7.  51
    Freedom of the will and mental content.Grant Gillett - 1993 - Ratio 6 (2):89-107.
    The idea of freedom of the will seems to conflict with the principle of causal efficacy implicit in many theories of mind. The conflict is normally resolved within a compatibilist view whereby the desires and beliefs of the agent, replete with a respectable if yet to be elucidated causal pedigree, are taken to be the basis of individual freedom. The present view is an alternative which erects mental content on a framework of rule following and then argues (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  5
    Degree with Comparison of Freedom of Will.Mst Atiya Ibnat - 2024 - International Journal of Philosophy 12 (4):97-101.
    This article explores the idea of "Freedom of Will" from a philosophical viewpoint, comparing key theories like Fatalism, Determinism, Indeterminism, and Self-Determinism. It starts with the age-old question: are humans truly free to make their own choices, or is everything in life already decided? The article looks at this debate by examining how fate and freedom interact. Drawing from Western philosophy, it discusses ideas from famous thinkers such as Plato, Aristotle, and Locke, showing how they contributed to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  29
    Metaphysical Basis of Freedom of Will: Examination, Critical Edition and Translation of Dāwūd al-Qarṣī’s Risāl'h fi’l-ikhtiyārāt al-juzʾiyyah wa’l-irādāt al-qalbiyyah.Mustafa Borsbuğa - 2021 - Kader 19 (1):233-321.
    This study will examine how Dāvūd al-Qarṣī, an 18th-century Ottoman scholar, resolved the paradox between human freewill and God being the creator of everything in his work Risālâh fi’l-ikhtiyārāt al-juzʾiyyah wa’l-irādāt al-qalbiyyah. In addition, in this study, the critical edition and translation of the risālah will also be provided. The treatise which is the subject of the present study is a link in the series of works written under the title of human acts in the Islamic thought tradition (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10. (1 other version)The Genesis and Freedom of Will and Action.J. E. Turner - 1920 - Philosophical Review 29:410.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Freedom of the will : Parallels between Frankfurt and Augustine.Jasper Hopkins - unknown
    At first glance it seems strange to compare the views of two philosophers from such different contexts as are Harry G. Frankfurt1 and Aurelius Augustinus. After all, Frankfurt makes virtually no use of Augustine, virtually no mention of his philosophical doctrines—whether on free will or anything else.2 And yet, the two have more to do with each other than initially meets the eye. For in their own ways both of them sketch a respective theory of freedom that is (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Leibniz, Freedom of Will and Rationality.Pauline Phemister - 1991 - Studia Leibnitiana 23 (1):25-39.
    Dieser Aufsatz hält es für angeraten, einen bisher vernachlässigten Aspekt der Leibnizschen Gedanken bezüglich der Willensfreiheit, nämlich die Rolle der Rationalität, näher zu betrachten. Von den drei für die Freiheit notwendigen Bedingungen gehört nur die Rationalität all denjenigen Menschen, die frei sind, und ihnen ausschließlich an. Kontingenz und Spontaneität können die Handlungen unfreier Menschen kennzeichnen. Die Rolle der Rationalität erscheint in klarem licht, wenn man sie in die Reihe folgender zueinander in Beziehung stehender Konzepte stellt: Kraft, Wahrnehmung, Tätigsein, Vollkommenheit, Schönheit, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  69
    Prize essay on the freedom of the will.Arthur Schopenhauer - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Günter Zöller.
    Written in 1839 and chosen as the winning entry in a competition held by the Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences, Schopenhauer's Prize Essay on the Freedom of the Will marked the beginning of its author's public recognition and is widely regarded as one of the most brilliant and elegant treatments of free will and determinism. Schopenhauer distinguishes the freedom of acting from the freedom of willing, affirming the former while denying the latter. He portrays human (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  14.  30
    The problem of the freedom of will: historico-philosophical topics in the analytic perspective. Hausmannn, M., & Noller, J. (Eds.). (2021). Free Will. Historical and Analytic Perspectives. Cham: Springer; Palgrave Macmillan. [REVIEW]Dmytro Sepetyi - 2022 - Sententiae 41 (1):111-122.
    Rewiew of Hausmannn, M., & Noller, J... Free Will. Historical and Analytic Perspectives. Cham: Springer; Palgrave Macmillan.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Moral Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes and Freedom of Will.Robert Kane - 2016 - The Journal of Ethics 20 (1-3):229-246.
    In his influential paper, “Freedom and Resentment,” P. F. Strawson argued that our ordinary practices of holding persons morally responsible and related reactive attitudes were wholly “internal” to the practices themselves and could be insulated from traditional philosophical and metaphysical concerns, including concerns about free will and determinism. This “insulation thesis” is a controversial feature of Strawson’s influential paper; and it has had numerous critics. The first purpose of this paper is to explain my own reasons for thinking (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16. (3 other versions)Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
    It is my view that one essential difference between persons and other creatures is to be found in the structure of a person's will. Besides wanting and choosing and being moved to do this or that, men may also want to have certain desires and motives. They are capable of wanting to be different, in their preferences and purposes, from what they are. Many animals appear to have the capacity for what I shall call "first-order desires" or "desires of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1611 citations  
  17. (1 other version)The Freedom of the Will.J. R. LUCAS - 1970 - Philosophy 47 (180):180-181.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  18. LOSSKY, N. O. -Freedom of Will[REVIEW]P. Leon - 1932 - Mind 41:385.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. The Freedom of the Will.John Randolph Lucas - 1970 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    It might be the case that absence of constraint is the relevant sense of ' freedom' when we are discussing the freedom of the will, but it needs arguing for. ...
  20. The question of the Freedom of Will in Epictetus.Marina Christodoulou - 2009 - Dissertation, The University of Edinburgh
    Stoic philosophers had to face the accusation of incoherence, self-contradiction and Paradoxes since ancient times. Plutarch in his Moralia writes against them; Cicero devotes a separate work on stoic paradoxes. Even in contemporary Literature there are still discussions on the possibility of such an incoherence and existence of paradoxes in the stoic theory. At first glance, stoic Cosmology gives the impression to both accept a kind of Determinism, and at the same time it undoubtedly argues for the moral agent’s (...) of the Will. In pre-stoic or even other contemporary to Stoicism Philosophical Traditions, the definitions that these two terms/concepts are given, fairly accuse as incoherent any Theory that does not set them as “contraries”. Under these types of accusations, the stoic Cosmology and Theory of the Freedom of the Will is often to be included. This phenomenal self-contradiction inside the Principles of Stoicism becomes even more obvious in Epictetus, a philosopher of the Late Stoa. He is interested in practical ethics, thus the phenomenal contradiction gets more lucid. This would have augmented the criticism of the Stoic philosophy for incoherence, if Epictetus had not made his main philosophical aim/target : the clarification of how an agent’s Will can be Free inside a Universe ruled by Fate/Destiny ; namely, a Universe merely Determined by Nature’s/God’s Will. Epictetus’ originality appears in the way he interrelates the concept of Freedom of the Will with the concept of Destiny and Determinism, in order to accomplish their simultaneous co-existence. This approach guards him against being easily accused for incoherence and self-contradiction. Through the unique way he understands and defines the Moral Agency, which is the agent’s internal state/condition/disposition, he steers towards an integrated, accomplished, strong and coherent line of argument. This sturdy declaration is able to support the weight of the Consent to a Free Will, and thus a certain kind Freedom of the moral agent. The excellence of this line of argument is that it can bear also the burden of the Consent to the phenomenally contrary concept of Determinism and Destiny. The elements used to the construction of this argument, which is stretched throughout the whole epictetean corpus can be summarised to a few key concepts, which are: the things which are in our power and the things which are not in our power, the concept of Freedom. These concepts work towards his philosophical targeting, because of the special definition he gives them. Axiomatically Epictetus states that in order for man to be free, it is necessary to be liberated from what the body forces him to do. Desires, passions and beliefs are considered as elements which are external to the moral agent. The moral agent “shrinks” into the Will. Thus man has the capability to free himself from anything external to his Will and therefore to harmonise his own Will to the Will of Nature/God; namely, to will what Nature/God wills and thus never conflict to the external facts. Consequently, Epictetus’ solution, is to include in the category of τά οὐκ ἐφ' ἡμῖν anything that he defines as external to the prohairesis: the desires, beliefs, passions and in general anything the body entails, the external facts. Thus the prohairesis, remains unhindered and it is completely depended on man’s power ; as characteristically Epictetus writes, “not even Zeus himself can overpower” the prohairesis. -/- Dissertation for the MSc Ancient Philosophy (2008-2009) at The University of Edinburgh, supervised by Inna Kupreeva. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Freedom of the will: a possible alternative.N. Elzein - 2008 - Dissertation, University College London
    This thesis is an investigation into free will, and the role of alternative possibilities. I defend an incompatibilist notion of freedom, but argue that such freedom is not exercised in all cases of decision-making. I begin by considering the debate surrounding Harry Frankfurt’s famous argument that alternative possibilities are irrelevant to freedom. I argue that the main disagreement can be best understood by considering the dispute surrounding the 'Flicker-of-Freedom' objection, which contends that there are still (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  35
    Freedom of the Will and Psychology.Louis J. A. Mercier - 1944 - New Scholasticism 18 (3):252-261.
  23.  5
    Freedom of the will without alternatives?: a critical assessment of Harry Frankfurt's intuition.James G. Pattarakalayil - 2018 - Bengaluru, India: ATC Publishers.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  73
    Freedom of the Will: A Conditional Analysis.Ferenc Huoranszki - 2010 - New York: Routledge.
    _Freedom of the Will_ provides a novel interpretation of G. E. Moore’s famous conditional analysis of free will and discusses several questions about the meaning of free will and its significance for moral responsibility. Although Moore’ theory has a strong initial appeal, most metaphysicians believe that there are conclusive arguments against it. Huoranszki argues that the importance of conditional analysis must be reevaluated in light of some recent developments in the theory of dispositions. The original analysis can be (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  25. (1 other version)The Freedom of the Will.Austin Farrer - 1958 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (41):82-83.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  26.  97
    Freedom and weakness of will.Paul Hoffman - 2008 - Ratio 21 (1):42–54.
    Can absolute freedom of will be defended by arguing that apparent cases of diminished freedom when we act out of passion are cases of weakness of will? Rogers Albritton thought so. What is intriguing about Albritton's view is that he thought when we act from desire we are making choices, yet our desires are not functioning as reasons for those choices. So our desires must be influencing our choices in some other unspecified way that does not (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Freedom of the Will—the Basis of Control1.Mario von Cranach - 2000 - In Walter J. Perrig & Alexander Grob (eds.), Control of Human Behavior, Mental Processes, and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of the 60th Birthday of August Flammer. Erlbaum.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  12
    The Freedom of Understanding in Kant’s Philosophy - the Spontaneity of Understanding, the Freedom of Will and the Transcendental Freedom -. 이재훈 - 2018 - Cheolhak-Korean Journal of Philosophy 137:27-51.
    이 연구에서 나는 칸트 철학에서 지성(Verstand)과 자유의 문제를 다룬다. 우선 나는 칸트에게서 지성의 자발성(die Spontaneität des Verstandes)은 몇몇 연구자들의 주장과 달리 상대적 자발성이 아니라 절대적 자발성이라고 주장한다. 그리고 나는, 기존의 연구들과 달리, 지성의 자발적 작용은 의지의 자유를 전제한다고 주장한다. 끝으로 나는 인식의 영역에서 지성의 자발성과 자유의지가 자유의 선험적 이념(die transzendentale Idee)에 의존한다고 주장한다. 칸트 철학에서 자발성은 이성적 존재자로서의 인간을 특징짓는 가장 중요한 개념이다. 인간의 행위가 자발적이라는 것은 인간의 행위의 근거가 인간 자신 안에 놓여 있다는 것을 의미한다. 이성적 존재자로서의 인간의 행위는 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. On the Concept of Freedom of Will in Ernst Tugendhat.Martin Muransky - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (9):890-905.
    The present analysis of the evolution of the concept of freedom in Ernst Tugendhat’s philosophy aims to highlight several interesting facts. First, Tugendhat attempts to describe the meaning of Kant’s statement “I could have acted otherwise” from a non-transcendental perspective. Second, he makes an effort to avoid the classical Kantian dilemma of the relation of free will and determinism by posing the question differently. Third, he situates the issue of the relation of freedom and causality in the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. The Modern Prevailing Notions Respecting... Freedom of Will.Jonathan Edwards - 1877
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Karma Theory, Determinism, Fatalism and Freedom of Will.Ricardo Sousa Silvestre - 2017 - Logica Universalis 11 (1):35-60.
    The so-called theory of karma is one of the distinguishing aspects of Hinduism and other non-Hindu south-Asian traditions. At the same time that the theory can be seen as closely connected with the freedom of will and action that we humans supposedly have, it has many times been said to be determinist and fatalist. The purpose of this paper is to analyze in some deepness the relations that are between the theory of karma on one side and determinism, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  32. Freedom of the Will: The Works of Jonathan Edwards.Paul Ramsey - 1957
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33. Freedom of the Will.Editor Editor - 1870 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 4:94.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Freedom of the Will and No-Self in Buddhism.Pujarini Das & Vineet Sahu - 2018 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 35 (1):121-138.
    The Buddha, unlike the Upaniṣadic or Brahmanical way, has avoided the concept of the self, and it seems to be left with limited conceptual possibilities for free will and moral responsibility. Now, the question is, if the self is crucial for free will, then how can free will be conceptualized in the Buddhist ‘no-self’ (anattā) doctrine. Nevertheless, the Buddha accepts a dynamic notion of cetanā (intention/volition), and it explicitly implies that he rejects the ultimate or absolute (...) of the will, but not the minimal power of free will. It seems that the Buddha’s view shifts from agent causation (independent ownership) to a causal sequence of impersonal processes (psychophysical factors). This paper claims to shed clarity on ‘whether free will is viable in the context of the anattāvāda in Buddhism.’ It mainly studies the secondary sources (even though it has also discussed the primary sources) and their interpretations of freedom of the will and how it further does argue for a compatibility approach of free will in Buddhist thought. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Freedom of the Will.D. F. Pears - 1966 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (2):286-287.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  49
    Freedom of Will. By N. O. Lossky , Professor of Philosophy in the Russian University of Prague. Translated by Natalie Duddington . (London: Williams & Norgate. 1932). [REVIEW]T. E. Jessop - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (29):115-.
  37. Weakness of Will and the Measurement of Freedom.Nicolas Côté - 2020 - Ethics 130 (3):384-414.
    This article argues for a novel approach to the measurement of freedom of choice, on which the availability of an option is a matter of degree, rather than a bivalent matter of being either available or not. This approach is motivated by case studies involving weakness of will, where deficiencies in willpower seem to impair individual freedom by making certain alternatives much harder to pursue. This approach is perfectly general, however: its graded analysis of option availability can (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  38.  20
    The Freedom of the Will.J. R. Lucas - 1970 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
    The author, who pioneered this argument in 1961, here places it in the context of traditional discussions of the problem, and answers various criticisms that have been made.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  39. Freedom of the Will (Doctrine).Garrett Pendergraft - 2017 - In Harry S. Stout, Kenneth P. Minkema & Adriaan Cornelis Neele (eds.), The Jonathan Edwards Encyclopedia. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
    Edwards’s views on the nature of the human will demonstrate his unique ability to unite philosophical rigor and theological fervor. Edwards was a staunch defender of the Reformed doctrines of absolute divine sovereignty and meticulous providence, but he was also a proponent of the intellectual tools and methods of early modern philosophy (and of John Locke in particular). His ultimate statement of his doctrinal position, Freedom of the Will, is the masterful result of these dual commitments.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. The freedom of the will.Alexander Petrunkevitch - 1905 - [Short Hills, N.J.,:
  41.  10
    Basic Jewish ethics and freedom of will.Abraham Chaim Weinfeld - 1968 - New York,: Block Pub. Co..
  42.  16
    Freedom of the Will in Communitarian Perspective.Alberto Pirni - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Boston: de Gruyter. pp. 509-520.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  39
    Freedom of action and freedom of will.Irving Thalberg - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (14):405-415.
  44.  86
    The Freedom Of The Will.Austin Farrer - 1958 - Westport, Conn.: Charles Scribner's Sons.
    Doctor Farrer discusses the Libertarian-Determinist controversy in terms of mind and body, speech and conduct, nature and spirit, and responsibility and value. It should be of interest to philosophers from both schools of thought.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  45.  25
    The Freedom of the Will.Antony Flew - 1971 - Philosophical Quarterly 21 (85):378.
    The author, who pioneered this argument in 1961, here places it in the context of traditional discussions of the problem, and answers various criticisms that have been made.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  46.  16
    Determinism and its discontents: morality, religion, and the need for freedom of will.Suresh Kanekar - 2021 - Boca Ration: Universal-Publishers.
    This monograph deals with the controversy about determinism versus freedom of will. The book is addressed to scholars, especially in the areas of philosophy and psychology, and also to thinking and serious-minded laypersons who are interested in the implications of being human. The book attempts to help the reader understand and resolve the dilemma of determinism. The solution offered by this book has not been previously offered by any other book, even though the literature on this topic is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  27
    The Evaluation of Quranic Statements Related to Satan Discortion in terms of Freedom of Will.Mehmet Emin Günel - 2019 - Kader 17 (1):185-206.
    There are statements in the Qur'an that Satan has an influence on human will. In many verses, it is recalled that the devil and his followers are the greatest enemy of mankind, and they set up traps to mislead humans. The expressions that are related to these satans from humans and demons make people think that they are desperate against their traps and cause some questions about whether human beings have full freedom in their actions. As a matter (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Freedom of the Will in Plato and Augustine.Jonathan Hecht - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):196-216.
    There has been a recent surge of interest in ancient accounts of free will. It is surprising, then, that there have been virtually no attempts to discuss whether Plato had such an account. Those who have made an attempt quickly deny that such an account is present in the dialogues. I shall argue that if we draw a distinction between two notions of free will, it is plausible that some account of free will is, in fact, present (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  49.  29
    Dimensions of responsibility: Freedom of action and freedom of will.Robert Kane - 2019 - Social Philosophy and Policy 36 (1):114-131.
    :In this essay, I distinguish two dimensions of responsibility: responsibility for expressing the will one has in action and responsibility for having the will one expresses in action. I argue that taking both of these dimensions into account is necessary to do full justice to our understanding of moral responsibility and our ordinary practices of holding persons responsible in moral and legal contexts. I further argue that the distinction between these dimensions of responsibility is importantly related to understanding (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?Caleb Yong - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.
    I take it that liberal justice recognises special protections against the restriction of speech and expression; this is what I call the Free Speech Principle. I ask if this Principle includes speech acts which might broadly be termed ‘hate speech’, where ‘includes’ is sensitive to the distinction between coverage and protection , and between speech that is regulable and speech that should be regulated . I suggest that ‘hate speech’ is too broad a designation to be usefully analysed as a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
1 — 50 / 951