Analizom rasprava koje su o Platonovu djelu "Država" napisali hrvatski intelektualci desne političke orijentacije u Nezavisnoj Državi Hrvatskoj, autor pokušava prikazati političku misao desnice u Hrvatskoj toga vremena. Analiza se usredotočuje na način na koji su ti intelektualci koristili Platona i njegovu viziju savršene države pri legitimiziranju totalitarne države i njezinih nositelja, totalitarnih pokreta, ali i pri njihovu kritiziranju. Ni legitimizacija niti kritika koje se iz Platonova djela izvode nisu iznenađenje: organicizam i monistički totalitarizam poklapao se s naumom desnih političkih (...) pokreta onodobne Europe, ali je istovremeno nedostižnost takvog ideala mogla lako poslužiti kao izvor kritike.This analysis of works on Plato’s Republic written by Croatian intelectuals of right political wing in the Independent State of Croatia is trying to represent the political thought of rights in contemporary Croatia. Analisys is concentrated on the ways by which those intelectuals used Plato and his vision of perfect state to legitimize totalitarian state such as the Independent State of Croatia,and totalitarian political movements such as the Ustashe movement,but also to criticise them. Both legitimization and critique that can derive from the Plato’s work should not be a surprise: organicism and monistic totalitarianism coincided with the goal of right wing movements in contemporary Europe,but at the same time the failure to reach such an ideal could easily provide a source for the critique. (shrink)

BOOK REVIEW Dražen Pehar, PEACE AS WAR: BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, POST- DAYTON, CEU Press, 2019 ISBN-13: 978-963-386-302-2.

Hate speech is a phenomenon which has been in the focus of scholarly interest of linguists, philosophers, sociologists, human-rights advocates, legal and media experts. Much of this interest has been devoted to establishing criteria for identifying what constitutes hate speech across disciplines. In this paper, we argue that hate speech has profiled as a distinct subgenre of the language of politics with typical patterns and ways of addressing which can be recognized in political campaigns across the world. Therefore, we present (...) the findings of the case study of translation exercises of English and Serbian texts containing samples of hateful language during presidential campaigns in the USA and Serbia in 2016 and 2017. Our aim is to identify the linguistico-pragmatic commonalities of hate speech in Serbian and English and examine students’ attitudes towards ethically and morally challenging language contents in their mother tongue and English as their foreign language. The results indicate that in both English and Serbian the same groups are targeted with the hateful language which in both languages uses vulgarisms, taboo words, sexist and chauvinistic declarative expressions to achieve political goals. In addition, L1>L2 and L2>L1 translation data indicate that personal moral and ethical norms in translators are stronger in L1 thus restrictively affecting translational L2>L1 output. (shrink)