In the framework of Stewart Shapiro, computations are performed directly on strings of symbols (numerals) whose abstract numerical interpretation is determined by a notation. Shapiro showed that a total unary function (unary relation) on natural numbers is computable in every injective notation if and only if it is almost constant or almost identity function (finite or co-finite set). We obtain a syntactic generalization of this theorem, in terms of quantifier-free definability, for functions and relations relatively intrinsically computable on certain types (...) of equivalence structures. We also characterize the class of relations and partial functions of arbitrary finite arities which are computable in every notation (be it injective or not). We consider the same question for notations in which certain equivalence relations are assumed to be computable. Finally, we discuss connections with a theorem by Ash, Knight, Manasse and Slaman which allow us to deduce some (but not all) of our results, based on quantifier elimination. (shrink)

We investigate the degree spectra of computable relations on canonically ordered natural numbers $$(\omega,<)$$ ( ω, < ) and integers $$(\zeta,<)$$ ( ζ, < ). As for $$(\omega,<)$$ ( ω, < ), we provide several criteria that fix the degree spectrum of a computable relation to all c.e. or to all $$\Delta _2$$ Δ 2 degrees; this includes the complete characterization of the degree spectra of so-called computable block functions that have only finitely many types of blocks. Compared to Bazhenov (...) et al. (in: LIPIcs, vol 219, pp 8:1–8:20, 2022), we obtain a more general solution to the problem regarding possible degree spectra on $$(\omega,<)$$ ( ω, < ), answering the question whether there are infinitely many such spectra. As for $$(\zeta,<)$$ ( ζ, < ), we prove the following dichotomy result: given an arbitrary computable relation R on $$(\zeta,<)$$ ( ζ, < ), its degree spectrum is either trivial or it contains all c.e. degrees. This result, and the proof techniques required to solve it, extend the analogous theorem for $$(\omega,<)$$ ( ω, < ) obtained by Wright (Computability 7:349–365, 2018), and provide initial insight to Wright’s question whether such a dichotomy holds on computable ill-founded linear orders. This article is an extended version of Bazhenov et al. (in: LIPIcs, vol 219, pp 8:1–8:20, 2022). (shrink)