Order:
  1.  50
    Comparative reflections on skill and the good life in zhuangzi and stoicism.Jiangxia Yu - 2020 - Asian Philosophy 30 (2):175-193.
    This paper explores the concept of skill in Zhuangzi and Stoicism, and argues that the role of the Stoic techne in practicing the art of living can be better understood if we introduce some perspec...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  55
    The Body in Spiritual Exercise: A Comparative Study between Epictetan Askēsis and Early Buddhist Meditation.Jiangxia Yu - 2014 - Asian Philosophy 24 (2):158-177.
    The paper explores the role of body in Epictetus’s Discourse and Buddhist Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta and underscores the importance of embodied practice in Epictetan askēsis (‘training or exercise’). It argues that the important but unrecognized role of the body in Epictetan askēsis can be better understood if we introduce in some perspectives of early Buddhism. From the angle of spiritual exercise, early Buddhism maintains that the meditator ought to experience the body directly and contemplate the body as an impermanent physical object, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  71
    The moral development in Stoic oikeiôsis and Wang Yang-ming’s ‘wan wu yi ti’.Jiangxia Yu - 2017 - Asian Philosophy 27 (2):150-173.
    The Neo-Confucian notion of wan wu yi ti 万物一体 and Stoic oikeiôsis both come up with a motivational basis for the expansion of concern, but one of the toughest problems in them is how to elaborate on selfhood and self–other relation in moral development. This paper takes a comparative view of Hierocles’ fragments and a few other relevant Stoic texts and Wang Yang-ming’s Inquiry on the Great Learning, and argues that doing so helps eliminate some confusions concerning selfhood and self–other (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The New Biopolitics.Jiangxia Yu & Jingwei Liu - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (4):287-296.
    The biotech revolution profoundly changes and reconstructs the Foucaultian concept of biopolitics from different dimensions. It declares the coming of the Age of Biocapitalism, which opens a new pattern of modern power allocation of life governance and shows people two prospects simultaneously: utopian hopes and dystopian desperation. Biocapitalism has not only produced ethical degeneration and cultural shock, but more importantly, has opened new areas for political hegemony and economic aggression through the reconstruction of biopolitics, and the enhancement of capital’s comprehensive (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation