The descriptions of the development of events in nature from the moment of the Big Bang are using concepts of ‘energy’ and ‘matter’. Systemically, these descriptions lack the third component of every system – information. This brings up the question of where in these descriptions information is and does it possibly precede energy. The analysis used the general systems theory, one of the powerful methods in modern science. For the description of the general technology , from the Big Bang to (...) the final point , we used our own concept based on two thoughts: the technology is nothing special but quite general and the fractal concept of Nature . It was found that the descriptions lack the answers to the question of the origin of information system whose activity began with the Big Bang. That information input is divided into command and data. With the help of philosophical knowledge, including Plato, Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas, it was concluded that someone had to make the natural laws that are transmitted in the form of information into energy during the Big Bang before inflation and the creation of matter. The question of who ordered the construction of the laws of nature and started the Big Bang is especially important. This article does not state explicitly who gave the order for the making and who made the transmitted information. (shrink)

Autor u tekstu kritički analizira Berdjajevljevu filozofiju stvaralaštva, iz cjelovitosti njegove filozofske misli, s posebnim naglaskom na odnosu sa slobodom. Započinje svoje ispitivanjem uvođenjem u egzistencijalnost autorova promišljanja teme i iznošenjem temeljnih pojmova. Potom slijedi istraživanje metafizičko-antropoloških temelja čovjekove sposobnosti za istinsko stvaranje. Kako ne bi bilo zabune oko naravi ljudskog stvaralaštva iz ‘meonske’ slobode, razjašnjena je bitna distinkcija između ljudskog i Božjeg stvaranja. Analizira se teurgija, kao specifičan oblik ljudskog stvaralaštva i način nadilaženja tragedije stvaralaštva. Kritički se ispituje struktura (...) čovjekova stvaralaštva, kao odnos čovjeka stvaraoca i svijeta. Konačno se nudi osnova za jednu buduću filozofiju čovjeka zasnovanu na ideji stvaralaštva.This article critically analyses Berdiaev’s philosophy of creativity in integrity of his philosophi­cal thought, with special emphasis on relation between creativity and freedom. The author be­gins his investigation with introduction in existentiality of Berdiaev’s analysis of the topic andwith explanation of fundamental concepts. Then follows investigation of metaphysical-anthro­pological foundations of human ability for genuine creativity. To avoid misunderstandings con­cerning nature of human creativity from ‘meonic freedom’, essential difference between humanand God’s creativity is explained. The article also analyses theurgy as specific form of humancreativity and a way to surpass tragedy of creativity. Structure of man’s creativity is criticallyanalysed as relation between man the creator and the world. Finally, it is offered a groundworkfor one future philosophy of man based on the idea of creativity. (shrink)