Results for 'Bioethics Philosophy.'

930 found
Order:
  1. Chung-Ying Cheng.Bioethics & Philosophy Of Bioethics - 2002 - In Julia Lai Po-Wah Tao (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on the (im) possibility of global bioethics. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  24
    Bioethics, Philosophy, and Philosophy of Disability.C. Dalrymple-Fraser - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):64-66.
    Blumenthal-Barby et al. (2022) list several areas of philosophy that may contribute to bioethics. Missing from their list and explicit discussion is the philosophy of disability. Whereas mainstream...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Tod Chambers.of Truth In Bioethics - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21:287-302.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Stephen wear.Character Of Bioethics - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16:53-70.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5.  77
    Introduction to a Collection of Issues within Bioethics, Philosophy of Medicine, and Philosophy of Psychiatry.J. A. Bulcock - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (2):83-90.
  6.  21
    The philosophy and practice of medicine and bioethics: a naturalistic-humanistic approach.Warren A. Shibles - 2010 - London: Springer. Edited by Barbara Maier.
    This book completes medical care by adding the comprehensive humanistic perspectives and philosophy of medicine.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7.  28
    Philosophy should and can contribute to bioethics: Tuija Takala, Peter Herissone-Kelly, and Søren Holm : Cutting through the surface: Philosophical approaches to bioethics. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2009, 258pp, €54 HB.Vicki Langendyk - 2010 - Metascience 20 (2):359-361.
    Philosophy should and can contribute to bioethics Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9476-2 Authors Vicki Langendyk, School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 1797, Australia Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  75
    The bioethical principles and Confucius' moral philosophy.D. F.-C. Tsai - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):159-163.
    This paper examines whether the modern bioethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice proposed by Beauchamp and Childress are existent in, compatible with, or acceptable to the leading Chinese moral philosophy—the ethics of Confucius. The author concludes that the moral values which the four prima facie principles uphold are expressly identifiable in Confucius’ teachings. However, Confucius’ emphasis on the filial piety, family values, the “love of gradation”, altruism of people, and the “role specified relation oriented ethics” will (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  9.  37
    Philosophies and Sociologies of Bioethics: Crossing the Divides.Hauke Riesch, Nathan Emmerich & Steven Wainwright (eds.) - 2018 - Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    This book is an interdisciplinary contribution to bioethics, bringing together philosophers, sociologists and Science and Technology Studies researchers as a way of bridging the disciplinary divides that have opened up in the study of bioethics. Each discipline approaches the topic through its own lens providing either normative statements or empirical studies, and the distance between the disciplines is heightened not only by differences in approach, but also disagreements over the values, interpretations and problematics within bioethical research. In order (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Bioethics: Reincarnation of Natural Philosophy in Modern Science.Valentin Teodorovich Cheshko, Valery I. Glazko & Yulia V. Kosova - 2017 - Biogeosystem Technique 4 (2):111-121.
    The theory of evolution of complex and comprising of human systems and algorithm for its constructing are the synthesis of evolutionary epistemology, philosophical anthropology and concrete scientific empirical basis in modern (transdisciplinary) science. «Trans-disciplinary» in the context is interpreted as a completely new epistemological situation, which is fraught with the initiation of a civilizational crisis. Philosophy and ideology of technogenic civilization is based on the possibility of unambiguous demarcation of public value and descriptive scientific discourses (1), and the object and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Feminist bioethics meets experimental philosophy: Embracing the qualitative and experiential.Catherine Womack & Norah Mulvaney-Day - 2012 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (1):113-132.
    Experimental philosophers advocate expansion of philosophical methods to include empirical investigation into the concepts used by ordinary people in reasoning and action. We propose also including methods of qualitative social science, which we argue serve both moral and epistemic goals. Philosophical analytical tools applied to interdisciplinary research designs can provide ways to extract rich contextual information from subjects. We argue that this approach has important implications for bioethics; it provides both epistemic and moral reasons to use the experiences and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12.  63
    Can Philosophy Save Christianity? Are the Roots of the Foundations of Christian Bioethics Ecumenical? Reflections on the Nature of a Christian Bioethics.H. Tristram Engelhardt - 1999 - Christian Bioethics 5 (3):203-212.
    H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.; Can Philosophy Save Christianity? Are the Roots of the Foundations of Christian Bioethics Ecumenical? Reflections on the Nature of.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  13.  13
    Bioethics” as a New Challenge to Philosophy.Kyungsuk Choi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:37-51.
    The advance of medical and biological science and technology has presented us with new ethical and legal issues. Is embryonic stem cell research morally justified and legally allowed? What moral status do embryos have? Who can be a morally appropriate user of In Vitro fertilization? Who can use donated sperm and/or egg? What is the scope of reproductive liberty?” What is the meaning of a family and that of reproduction? How far does our genetic intervention go?”Scientists, lawyers, and laymen are (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  28
    Bioethics Consultation and First-Order Moral Reasoning: Leaving Philosophy at the Hospital Doors.Dave Langlois & Jeremy Butler - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):41-43.
    Barby-Blumenthal et al. (2022) argue that academic philosophy still has important contributions to make to bioethics. We agree with some and disagree with many of their claims. In this commentary,...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  17
    Inflationary Bioethics: On Fact and Value in the Philosophy of Medicine.Antonio Casado da Rocha - 2008 - Praxis 1 (2).
    This critical notice argues for the existence of a new trend in bioethics, a complex and dynamic field of philosophical enquiry that goes beyond applied ethics and professional deontological codes. This trend supplements their traditionally “minimalist” ethics—and its concern with harm, rights or justice—with “inflationary” positions open to an integration of medicine with the humanities. By comparing and contrasting the views of two quite different philosophers, Diego Gracia and Alfred Tauber, and placing them within the theoretical background delineated by (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  52
    Flesh of My Flesh: The Ethics of Cloning Humans a Reader.Gregory E. Pence, George Annas, Stephen Jay Gould, George Johnson, Axel Kahn, Leon Kass, Philip Kitcher, R. C. Lewontin, Gilbert Meilaender, Timothy F. Murphy, National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Chief Justice John Roberts & James D. Watson - 1998 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Flesh of My Flesh is a collection of articles by today's most respected scientists, philosophers, bioethicists, theologians, and law professors about whether we should allow human cloning. It includes historical pieces to provide background for the current debate. Religious, philosophical, and legal points of view are all represented.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  46
    Bioethics is Philosophy.Rosamond Rhodes & Gary Ostertag - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):22-25.
    In their target article, Blumenthal-Barby et al. (2022) address the view that bioethics as a philosophical discipline is obsolete. Indeed, their discussion was prompted by a recent bioethics confer...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  41
    The Role of Philosophy After the Empirical Turn in Bioethics.Guy Widdershoven & Suzanne Metselaar - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):49-51.
    In “The Place of Philosophy in Bioethics Today,” Blumenthal-Barby and colleagues argue that philosophy is indispensable to the field of bioethics (Blumenthal-Barby et al. 2022). Nonetheless, they i...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19.  13
    Disability, Bioethics, and the Duty to Do Public Philosophy During a Global Pandemic.Joseph A. Stramondo - 2022 - In Lee C. McIntyre, Nancy Arden McHugh & Ian Olasov (eds.), A companion to public philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 65–74.
    This chapter argues that, sometimes, disabled bioethicists actually have a duty to do public philosophy. It contends that this duty can be justified with ethical, epistemic, and prudential reasons. Any triage protocol will discriminate against disabled people if one uses a broadly inclusive definition of disability that subsumes diseases or chronic illnesses that can be disabling in their effects, like cancer or kidney failure. The most obvious reasons justifying a duty to do public philosophy as a disabled bioethicist are ethical. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  29
    How Philosophy of Science Can Unlock New Methods in Bioethics.Mark Fedyk - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):51-53.
    Blumenthal-Barby and colleagues (2022) argue that philosophy continues to be relevant to bioethics. To support their argument, they offer several examples of how—not philosophy, exactly—but normati...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21. Half a century of bioethics and philosophy of medicine: A topic‐modeling study.Piotr Bystranowski, Vilius Dranseika & Tomasz Żuradzki - 2022 - Bioethics 36 (9):902-925.
    Topic modeling—a text‐mining technique often used to uncover thematic structures in large collections of texts—has been increasingly frequently used in the context of the analysis of scholarly output. In this study, we construct a corpus of 19,488 texts published since 1971 in seven leading journals in the field of bioethics and philosophy of medicine, and we use a machine learning algorithm to identify almost 100 topics representing distinct themes of interest in the field. On the basis of intertopic correlations, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  22.  20
    Taking Persons Seriously: Where Philosophy and Bioethics Intersect.Mihretu P. Guta & Scott B. Rae (eds.) - 2024 - Eugene, Oregon.: Pickwick Publications, Wipf and Stock Publishers.
    This volume attempts to show why ontology matters for a proper grasp of issues in bioethics. -/- Contemporary discussions on bioethics often focus on seeking solutions for a wide range of issues that revolve around persons. The issues in question are multi-layered, involving such diverse aspects as the metaphysical/ontological, personal, medical, moral, legal, cultural, social, political, religious, and environmental. In navigating through such a complex web of issues, it has been said that the central problems philosophers and bioethicists (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  76
    Philosophy as news: Bioethics, journalism and public policy.Kenneth K. W. Goodman - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (2):181 – 200.
    News media accounts of issues in bioethics gain significance to the extent that the media influence public policy and inform personal decision making. The increasingly frequent appearance of bioethics in the news thus imposes responsibilities on journalists and their sources. These responsibilities are identified and discussed, as is (i) the concept of "newsworthiness" as applied to bioethics, (ii) the variable quality of bioethics reportage and (iii) journalists' reliance on ethicists to pass judgment. Because of the potential (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. The Place of Philosophy in Bioethics Today.Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Sean Aas, Dan Brudney, Jessica Flanigan, S. Matthew Liao, Alex London, Wayne Sumner & Julian Savulescu - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):10-21.
    In some views, philosophy’s glory days in bioethics are over. While philosophers were especially important in the early days of the field, so the argument goes, the majority of the work in bioethics today involves the “simple” application of existing philosophical principles or concepts, as well as empirical work in bioethics. Here, we address this view head on and ask: What is the role of philosophy in bioethics today? This paper has three specific aims: (1) to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  25. Moral philosophy and bioethics: contextualism versus the paradigm theory.Earl Winkler - 1996 - In L. Wayne Sumner & Joseph Boyle (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics. University of Toronto Press. pp. 50--78.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26.  27
    Phenomenological Bioethics: Medical Technologies, Human Suffering, and the Meaning of Being Alive.Fredrik Svenaeus - 2017 - New York: Routledge.
    This book brings phenomenology, the main player in the continental tradition of philosophy, to bioethics. Medical science and emerging technologies are examined as endeavours that bring enormous possibilities in relieving human suffering but also great risks in transforming our fundamental life views.
  27.  45
    Medicine, Philosophy, and Theology: Christian Bioethics Reconsidered.H. Tristram Engelhardt - 2002 - Christian Bioethics 8 (2):105-117.
    H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.; Medicine, Philosophy, and Theology: Christian Bioethics Reconsidered, Christian bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morali.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  28. Bioethics and the Philosophy of Medicine: A Thirty-Year Perspective.H. Tristram Engelhardt - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):565-568.
  29.  24
    Bioethics and philosophy.K. Danner Clouser - 1993 - Hastings Center Report 23 (6):10-11.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  30.  52
    How Philosophy and Theology Have Undermined Bioethics.Nicholas Capaldi - 2007 - Christian Bioethics 13 (1):53-66.
    This essay begins by distinguishing among the viewpoints of philosophy, theology, and religion; it then explores how each deals with “sin” in the bioethical context. The conclusions are that the philosophical and theological viewpoints are intellectually defective in that they cripple our ability to deal with normative issues, and are in the end unable to integrate Christian concepts like “sin” successfully into bioethics. Sin is predicated only of beings with free will, though only in Western Christianity must all sins (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31.  16
    Social philosophy approach to the bioethics debate.Christian Beck - 2007 - Disputatio Philosophica 9 (1):165-170.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  94
    Bioethics and the Philosophy of Medicine: A Thirty-Year Perspective.H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jeremy Garrett & Fabrice Jotterand - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):565-568.
  33.  29
    The Role of Philosophy in Global Bioethics.Sirkku K. Hellsten - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (2):185-194.
    Abstract:This article examines the relationship between philosophy and culture in global bioethics. First, it studies what is meant by the term “global” in global bioethics. Second, the author introduces four different types, or recognizable trends, in philosophical inquiry in bioethics today. The main argument is that, in order to make better sense of the complexity of the ethical questions and challenges we face today across the globe, we need to embrace the universal nature of self-critical and analytical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  47
    Bioethics: methods, theories, domains.Marcus Düwell - 2013 - New York: Routledge.
    This book is a philosophically-oriented introduction to bioethics. It offers the reader an overview of key debates in bioethics relevant to various areas including; organ retrieval, stem cell research, justice in healthcare and issues in environmental ethics, including issues surrounding food and agriculture. The book also seeks to go beyond simply describing the issues in order to provide the reader with the methodological and theoretical tools for a more comprehensive understanding of current bioethical debates. The aim of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  35.  53
    Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation.José-Antonio Seoane & Pedro Serna (eds.) - 2016 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
    This book clarifies the meaning of the most important and pervasive concepts and tools in bioethical argumentation and assesses the methodological suitability of the main methods for clinical decision-making and argumentation. The first part of the book is devoted to the most developed or promising approaches regarding bioethical argumentation, namely those based on principles, values and human rights. The authors then continue to deal with the contributions and shortcomings of these approaches and suggest further developments by means of substantive and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  36. Disputes over moral status: Philosophy and science in the future of bioethics.Lisa Bortolotti - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (2):153-8.
    Various debates in bioethics have been focused on whether non-persons, such as marginal humans or non-human animals, deserve respectful treatment. It has been argued that, where we cannot agree on whether these individuals have moral status, we might agree that they have symbolic value and ascribe to them moral value in virtue of their symbolic significance. In the paper I resist the suggestion that symbolic value is relevant to ethical disputes in which the respect for individuals with no intrinsic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  37.  18
    Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics.A. Twenty-Year Retrospective - 2002 - Philosophy 50.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  50
    Inquiry in Bioethics and the Philosophy of Medicine: Organ Donation, Defining Death, and Fairness in Distribution.Victor Saenz - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (3):263-277.
    This issue of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy brings together fresh essays addressing three main genres of questions: questions about the nature of bioethical inquiry and the relevance of the humanities to medical practice; questions regarding the ethics of organ donation; questions bearing on the application of fairness to the distribution of medical resources.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  42
    Grounding medical ethics in philosophy of medicine: problematic and potential.Patrick Daly - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (3):169-182.
    After considering two of Pellegrino’s papers that address the relation between philosophy of medicine and medical ethics, I identify several overarching problems in his account that revolve around his self-described essentialism and the lack of a systematic attempt to relate clinical medicine to biomedicine and public health. I address these from the critical realist position of Bernard Lonergan, who grounds both metaphysics and ethics on the normative structure of human inquiry and seeks to understand historical development, such as we are (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  31
    Thieves of Virtue: When Bioethics Stole Medicine.Tom Koch - 2012 - MIT Press.
    Bioethics claimed to offer a set of generally applicable, universally accepted guidelines that would simplify complex situations. In Thieves of Virtue, Tom Koch argues that bioethics has failed to deliver on its promises.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  41.  27
    Contextuality, Bioethics, and the Nature of Philosophy: Reflections on Murdoch, Diamond, Walker, and the Groningen Approach.Nora Hämäläinen - 2021 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 14 (1):103-119.
    Beginning with Barry Hoffmaster’s charge that we reclaim bioethics from the moral philosopher’s top-down theorizing, I discuss two moral philosophy contexts that offer resources for the kind of complex attention Hoffmaster demands: Iris Murdoch and Cora Diamond in moral philosophy and Margaret Urban Walker, Hilde Lindeman, and Marian Verkerk’s joint take on bioethics. My aim is: 1) to dispel a simplified notion of philosophy in bioethics; 2) to unite two strands of philosophy, which converge on important issues (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  26
    Bioethics Research Group and Beyond: Three Decades of Studies in Ethics and Political Philosophy.Nils Holtug, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Jesper Ryberg & Peter Sandøe - 2020 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 53 (1):133-161.
    The aim of this paper is to present some important contributions to ethics, value theory and political philosophy the former members of the Bioethics Research Group have made. The group was established at the University of Copenhagen in 1992 and was formally dissolved in 1997, but the members continued to work in ethics and political philosophy and set up research groups and centres at four Danish universities. Within four research themes, contributions made over the years are described. Research outputs (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  63
    Bioethics and philosophy of science.Robert M. Veatch - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):227-231.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  84
    (1 other version)Why bioethics needs the philosophy of medicine: Some implications of reflection on concepts of health and disease.George Khushf - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2):145-163.
    Germund Hesslow has argued that concepts of health and disease serve no important scientific, clinical, or ethical function. However, this conclusion depends upon the particular concept of disease he espouses; namely, on Boorse's functional notion. The fact/value split embodied in the functional notion of disease leads to a sharp split between the science of medicine and bioethics, making the philosophy of medicine irrelevant for both. By placing this disease concept in the broader context of medical history, I shall show (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  45. The appearance of Kant's deontology in contemporary Kantianism: Concepts of patient autonomy in bioethics.Barbara Secker - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):43 – 66.
    Kant's concept of autonomy and the Kantian notion of autonomy are often conflated in bioethics. However, the contemporary Kantian notion has very little at all to do with Kant's original. In order to further bioethics discourse on autonomy, I critically distinguish the contemporary Kantian notion from Kant's original concept of moral autonomy. I then evaluate the practical relevance of both concepts of autonomy for use in bioethics. I argue that it is not appropriate to appeal to either (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  46. (1 other version)Bioethics and the limits of philosophy.Max Charlesworth - forthcoming - Bioethics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  30
    The Place of Bioethics in Philosophy: Toward a Mutually Constructive Integration.Pierce Randall, Daniel T. Kim & Wayne Shelton - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):54-56.
    The critique to which Blumenthal-Barby et al. (2022), respond—that philosophy has little left to do in bioethics—reflects a common assumption that normative theorizing first generates general moral...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  27
    Philosophy for Children and Youth and Integrative Bioethics.Marina Katinić - 2012 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 32 (3-4):587-603.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  47
    Space bioethics: Why we need it and why it should be a feminist space bioethics.Konrad Szocik - 2020 - Bioethics 35 (2):187-191.
    Space philosophy offers rich insights in the future and is already well‐developed new branch of philosophy. However, space philosophers still do not pay much attention to a number of bioethical issues that may occur in space. This paper aims to introduce space bioethics, as a new branch in space philosophy, space ethics and space policy, to the philosophical and bioethical discourse. The basic issues discussed in space bioethics include—but are not limited to—human reproduction in space and human enhancement (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  50. Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress.Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):28-33.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
1 — 50 / 930