ArgumentDrawing and writing number among the most widespread scientific practices of representation. Neither photography, graphic recording apparatuses, typewriters, nor digital word- and image-processing ever completely replaced drawing and writing by hand. The interaction of hand, paper, and pen indeed involves much more than simply recording or visualizing what was previously thought, observed, or imagined. Both writing and drawing have the power to translate concepts and observations into two-dimensional, manageable, reproducible objects. They help to develop research questions and they open up (...) an interaction between the gathering of phenomena and the formation of theses. Related to the manifold studies of representational activities in the sciences and the humanities, this topical issue tries to refine our understanding of the capacities of drawing and writing as research techniques; i.e. as productive epistemic practices. In particular the contributions address three aspects: the material conditions and configurations of the “scene of drawing and writing,” the involved procedures of production, and the languages of inscription. (shrink)

ArgumentBiological drawings of newly described or revised species are expected to represent the type specimen with greatest possible accuracy. In taxonomic practice, illustrations assume the function of mobile representatives of relatively immobile specimens. In other words, such illustrations serve as “immutable mobiles” in the Latourian sense. However, the significance of drawing in the context of first descriptions goes far beyond that of illustration in the conventional sense. Not only does it synthesize the verbal catalogue of the type's morphological characteristics: it (...) also enables the examination of these traits. The efficacy of drawing is thus closely related to its power to direct and redirect observation; it is inextricably bound up with the act of making a drawing. Although the invariance of the “immutable mobiles” is a key virtue of the logistics of “paperwork,” the recovery of graphic knowledge requires a much stronger dynamic activity – a process of sequential processing that brings out differences by translating the phenomenon under examination into various modes of graphic representation. (shrink)

In der Geschichte des künstlerischen, technischen und architektonischen Entwerfens wurde das Zeichnen weitgehend mit bestimmten Projektionstechniken identifiziert. Allerdings dürfte sich die eigentlich generative Kraft des Zeichnens schwerlich auf den Stabilisierungs- und Übertragungsvorgang beschränken lassen. Wo gezeichnet wird, wird auch überzeichnet, durchgestrichen, neu begonnen, also: immer weiter gezeichnet. Worin besteht nun also die Leistung des Zeichnens als Werkzeug des Entwurfs? In the history of artistic, technical and architectonical design, drawing has largely been identified with certain techniques of projection. However, the actual (...) productive potency of drawing can hardly be reduced to an act of stabilization and transferal. Drawing also means to draw over, to cross out, to start anew, and therefore: to keep drawing. What is, then, the benefit of drawing as a tool for designing? (shrink)