Rumfitt on truth-grounds, negation, and vagueness

Philosophical Studies 175 (8):2079-2089 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In The Boundary Stones of Thought, Rumfitt defends classical logic against challenges from intuitionistic mathematics and vagueness, using a semantics of pre-topologies on possibilities, and a topological semantics on predicates, respectively. These semantics are suggestive but the characterizations of negation face difficulties that may undermine their usefulness in Rumfitt’s project.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-10

Downloads
1,150 (#16,324)

6 months
146 (#30,731)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Zach
University of Calgary

Citations of this work

Mathematics and Metaphilosophy.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
What is Logical Monism?Justin Clarke-Doane - forthcoming - In Christopher Peacocke & Paul Boghossian (eds.), Normative Realism.
Reply to Crispin Wright and Richard Zach.Ian Rumfitt - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (8):2091-2103.

Add more citations

References found in this work

True, Truer, Truest.Brian Weatherson - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 123 (1):47-70.
Pretopologies and completeness proofs.Giovanni Sambin - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (3):861-878.

Add more references