Abstract

Humans in all cultures and in all disciplines are automatically engaged with Metaphysical Naturalism, Intelligent Design, and The Circular Theory. A unified technological understanding of all disciplines (Modern Thinking) without the overhead (redundancy) of large language modeling is already present in mathematics. With a broader understanding, humans gain a competitive advantage in finance. Which is the (applied) tokenization of tokenzation (monetization) that humans use to survive (also known in mathematics, philosophy, and technology as representation). This article provides a clearly documented foundation so we are all on ‘the same page’ so-to-speak (going forward). Note To Readers: We cannot use language in the traditional sense (or in the technological sense) if we want to understand the behavior in Nature. And that is because a symbol (which is the basis for language) requires is created by and as the diagram in this article (which is proof pi in mathematics is what humans call ‘mind’ and or ‘brain’) (pi connects a circumference and a diameter) (therefore pi is in control of all circular-linear relationships) (everything in Nature). This takes some getting used to. Because humans are engaged constantly with language (and the media). Nature is unable to segregate humans from the media from itself. That is, all of the behavior, and all of the constituents, in Nature, are not separate from Nature. This is the circular-linear relationship between any and every X and X (X and Y) (X and X’). The circular linear relationship is what humans identify as a circle in mathematics. Typically, since ancient times, a circle is defined as a set of points equidistant from a central point. Unfortunately, this is not a true definition of a circle. A circle is the circular linear relationship between a circumference and a diameter, so, the diagram above corrects this mistake, giving all of us a deeper insight into the circular linear relationship between mind and matter (abstract and concrete ‘reality’). The diagram is a concrete abstraction for concrete abstraction (abstraction) (abstraction as a noun) (abstraction as a verb) (abstraction is an alternate term for tokenization) (eventually, we begin to see all nouns and verbs articulate the circular-linear relationship) (circle as a noun) (circle as a verb). And, yes, this is distasteful to half (a circle is both a half and a whole, it is impossible to have one without the other) (producing the ambiguity between the numbers 'one' and 'two') (the requirement for an idea and an additional idea). (Symmetry and sequence.) Correctly stated: Complementarity is an alternate word for identity. If zero, then, one, and, simultaneously, if one, then, zero. Meaning: there is only one 'true' number in Nature, the arithmetic number 'two' (zero and one in physics) (one and two in mathematics) (and all the other disciplines) (explaining and controlling everything in technology) (demonstrated and proven by music) (multi-channel mathematics in all disciplines).