Necessary and Contingent Effects

Review of Metaphysics 11 (2):202 - 214 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Instead of talking about events, however, let us speak of effects, since presumably all events are effects. Then a necessary effect would seem to be one that cannot not be caused, if we interpret "necessary" in an analogous way here.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In The Last Analysis. [REVIEW]L. K. B. - 1957 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (4):715-715.
A Question of Entailment.John O. Nelson - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (2):364 - 377.
Logical Constants: Part I.Irwin C. Lieb - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 7 (1):36 - 52.
Can there be necessary connections between successive events?Nicholas Maxwell - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):1-25.
Entailment and the Modal Fallacy.John Bacon - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):566 - 571.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
34 (#668,143)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references