Calibration and Convexity: Response to Gregory Wheeler

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):851-857 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note responds to some criticisms of my recent book In Defence of Objective Bayesianism that were provided by Gregory Wheeler in his ‘Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-convex Evidence’

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-convex Evidence.Gregory Wheeler - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):841-850.
Bayesian statistics in radiocarbon calibration.Daniel Steel - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S153-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-04

Downloads
103 (#206,881)

6 months
12 (#311,239)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon Williamson
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

Bayesian Epistemology.Jürgen Landes - 2022 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):1-7.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Set-based bayesianism.H. Kyburg & M. Pittarelli - 1996 - Ieee Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics A 26 (3):324--339.
An objective Bayesian account of confirmation.Jon Williamson - 2011 - In Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao Gonzalo, Thomas Uebel, Stephan Hartmann & Marcel Weber (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Springer. pp. 53--81.

Add more references