Explaining Quantifier Restriction: Reply to Ben-Yami

Logique Et Analyse 55 (217):109-120 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a reply to H. Ben-Yami, 'Generalized quantifiers, and beyond' (this journal, 2009), where he argues that standard GQ theory does not explain why natural language quantifiers have a restricted domain of quantification. I argue, on the other hand, that although GQ theory gives no deep explanation of this fact, it does give a sort of explanation, whereas Ben-Yami's suggested alternative is no improvement.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Generalized Quantifiers, and Beyond.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2009 - Logique Et Analyse (208):309-326.
Aristotle, Term Logic, and QUARC.Jonas Raab - 2024 - In George Englebretsen (ed.), New Directions in Term Logic. London: College Publications. pp. 427-503.
Why Rigidity?Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2014 - In Jonathan Berg (ed.), Naming, Necessity and More: Explorations in the Philosophical Work of Saul Kripke. London and New York: Palgrave. pp. 3-21.
Completeness of the Quantified Argument Calculus on the Truth-Valuational Approach.Hanoch Ben-Yami & Edi Pavlović - 2022 - In Boran Berčić, Aleksandra Golubović & Majda Trobok (eds.), Human Rationality: Festschrift for Nenad Smokrović. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka. pp. 53–77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-03

Downloads
79 (#265,921)

6 months
4 (#1,255,690)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dag Westerståhl
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

The Quantified Argument Calculus.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):120-146.
Aristotle, Logic, and QUARC.Jonas Raab - 2018 - History and Philosophy of Logic 39 (4):305-340.
Response to Westerstahl.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2012 - Logique Et Analyse 55 (217):47-55.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references