Accountability and Sanctions in English Schools

British Journal of Educational Studies 59 (1):41-62 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper focuses on accountability in school-based education in England. It explores notions of accountability and proposes a new framework for its analysis. It then identifies a number of types of accountability which are present in school-based education, and discusses each in terms of who is accountable to whom and for what. It goes on to examine the sanctions associated with each type of accountability and some possible effects of each type. School performance cross-cuts virtually all facets of accountability, but is fundamental to hierarchical and market accountability where it is associated with a high likelihood of severe sanctions. This, it is argued, means that schools are likely to focus on these forms of accountability as opposed to participative or network accountabilities that involve collaboration with others. The final section proposes that there is a case for accountability systems to focus more broadly on a variety of processes and outcomes related to the overall goals of education. The existing regime in England is heavily focused on hierarchical and market accountability: a greater focus on participative and network accountability may foster a less individualistic approach to education and greater social cohesion

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Towards a Non-Punitive School Inspection Régime.Christopher Winch - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (4):683-694.
A Contingency Theory of Accountability.Jane Mansbridge - 2014 - In Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin & Thomas Schillemans, The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford University Press.
School Admissions: Increasing Equity, Accountability and Transparency.Anne West, Hazel Pennell & Philip Noden - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (2):188 - 200.
Is ‘School Effectiveness’ Anti-Democratic?Terry Wrigley - 2003 - British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (2):89-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-17

Downloads
41 (#595,640)

6 months
9 (#419,669)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Roberts
University of Sheffield

References found in this work

School Admissions: Increasing Equity, Accountability and Transparency.Anne West, Hazel Pennell & Philip Noden - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (2):188 - 200.
HMI and OFSTED : Evolution or Revolution in School Inspection.John Lee & Johh Fitz - 1997 - British Journal of Educational Studies 45 (1):39-52.
Education Accountability: An Analytic Overview.M. Kogan - 1987 - British Journal of Educational Studies 35 (3):282-283.

Add more references