Sinnlichkeit und Verstand: Zur transzendentallogischen Entfaltung des Gegenstandsbezugs bei Kant

De Gruyter (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For Kant, sensibility and reason are the two cornerstones for all knowledge that is possible for us. The question of their mediation has occupied Kant researchers ever since the publication of the Critique of Pure Reason. By analyzing the most important theoretical elements of the critique of reason, the author offers a new approach for evaluating the argumentation of Kant's transcendental logic. scendental logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant on Demarcation and Discovery.Nathaniel Goldberg - 2017 - Kant Yearbook 9 (1):43-62.
Immanuel Kant: The very idea of a critique of pure reason.J. Colin McQuillan - 2016 - Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason Within the Tradition of Modern Logic.Marco Sgarbi - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Boston: de Gruyter. pp. 497-508.
Kant’s Two Conceptions of Reason in the Critique of Pure Reason.Marcus Willaschek - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Boston: de Gruyter. pp. 483-492.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-08

Downloads
8 (#1,577,832)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kants Begriff der Funktion und die Vollständigkeit der Urteils- und Kategorientafel.Till Hoeppner - 2011 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 65 (2):193-217.

Add more references