Weighing Up Weighted Lotteries: Scarcity, Overlap Cases, and Fair Inequalities of Chance

Ethics 130 (3):320-348 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After providing a novel taxonomy of lottery procedures for fairly distributing scarce goods, I defend a new weighted lottery theory. This taxonomy is necessary because the debate between unweighted and weighted lottery theorists overlooks a range of cases, overlap cases, in which conducting an unweighted lottery is impossible or implausible. Therefore, to account for all such cases, lottery theorists must adopt a weighted lottery. However, while no extant weighted lottery is adequate in overlap cases, my new weighted lottery theory is. I conclude by discussing my theory’s practical implications.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,899

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-07

Downloads
63 (#367,468)

6 months
18 (#170,452)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gerard Vong
Emory University

References found in this work

Should the numbers count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Noncomparative justice.Joel Feinberg - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (3):297-338.
Saving lives, moral theory, and the claims of individuals.Michael Otsuka - 2006 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2):109–135.
Fairness.Brad Hooker - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.

View all 20 references / Add more references