How to be absolutely fair Part II: Philosophy meets economics

Economics and Philosophy 40 (3):650-672 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the article ‘How to be absolutely fair, Part I: the Fairness formula’, we presented the first theory of comparative and absolute fairness. Here, we relate the implications of our Fairness formula to economic theories of fair division. Our analysis makes contributions to both philosophy and economics: to the philosophical literature, we add an axiomatic discussion of proportionality and fairness. To the economic literature, we add an appealing normative theory of absolute and comparative fairness that can be used to evaluate axioms and division rules. Also, we provide a novel definition and characterization of the absolute priority rule.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-08

Downloads
39 (#568,851)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Stefan Wintein
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Conrad Heilmann
Erasmus University Rotterdam

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

V*—Fairness.John Broome - 1991 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1):87-102.
Selecting people randomly.John Broome - 1984 - Ethics 95 (1):38-55.
Fairness.Brad Hooker - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
Fairness.Bradford Hooker - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329-352.
Treating Broome Fairly.Christian Piller - 2017 - Utilitas 29 (2):214-238.

View all 21 references / Add more references