The basic assumptions of e-z reader are not well-founded

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):506-507 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the two basic assumptions of the E-Z Reader model, discussing the possibility that adjacent words in reading may be processed in parallel rather than serially, and presenting evidence against a cognitive control of eye guidance in reading.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On keeping word order straight.Alan Kennedy - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):490-491.
The game of word skipping: Who are the competitors?Ralf Engbert & Reinhold Kliegl - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):481-482.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#552,696)

6 months
13 (#272,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?