- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
St. Anselm's ontological argument succumbs to Russell's paradox
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):123-128 (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The ontological argument and Russell's antinomy.Sara L. Uckelman - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (3-4):309-312.
St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Russell’s Theory of Descriptions.Herbert Hochberg - 1959 - New Scholasticism 33 (3):319-330.
St. Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chryssi Sidiropoulou - 2009 - Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):131-152.
"Exists" and St. Anselm's Argument.Philip E. Devine - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):59-70.
Existence, Eternality, and the Ontological Argument.Patricia H. Werhane - 1985 - Idealistic Studies 15 (1):54-59.
The Ontological Argument: A Critique of St. Anselm's Proslogion Ii and Iii.Earl Raye Winkler - 1971 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
The fool and the ontological status of st Anselm's argument.Albert W. Wald - 1974 - Heythrop Journal 15 (4):406–422.
A Careful Reading of St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument.Clint I. Barrett - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):217-230.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
127 (#171,885)
6 months
10 (#399,629)
2009-01-28
Downloads
127 (#171,885)
6 months
10 (#399,629)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Monotonic and Non-monotonic Embeddings of Anselm’s Proof.Jacob Archambault - 2017 - Logica Universalis 11 (1):121-138.
Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm’s ontological argument.Esther Ramharter & Günther Eder - 2015 - Synthese 192 (9):2795-2825.
Wittgenstein’s Case for the Fool: Existence in the Mind Is a Mentalist Assumption in Anselm’s Epistemological Argument in Proslogion, 2.Andrey Pukhaev - forthcoming - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy.
The ontological argument and Russell's antinomy.Sara L. Uckelman - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (3-4):309-312.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-q5wnn uwo