"Exists" and St. Anselm's Argument

Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):59-70 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines interpretations of the doctrine that "exists" is not a predicate (existence is not a property). None, it is concluded, is both true and a refutation of St. Anselm's "ontological" argument for the existence of God.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reality and existence in Anselm.Stephen Priest - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (4):461–462.
Alvin Plantinga on the ontological argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
Gasking's proof.William Grey - 2000 - Analysis 60 (4):368-370.
St. Anselm's Proslogion: With a Reply on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilo and the Author's Reply to Gaunilo.Saint Anselm - 1979 - Notre Dame [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by M. J. Charlesworth, Gaunilo & Anselm.
Does Anselm beg the question?Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):5-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
59 (#361,724)

6 months
14 (#226,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Devine
Providence College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references