Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement

Abstract

We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Structure-sensitive testimonial norms.Benedikt T. A. Höltgen - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-23.
Do Scientists Need Social Networks for Scientists?Evgeny V. Maslanov - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (4):37-42.
Communicative Classification of Science.Евгений Валерьевич Масланов - 2025 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 62 (1):49-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-22

Downloads
20 (#1,123,941)

6 months
20 (#148,971)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Peter Vickers
Durham University
Mark Alfano
Macquarie University
18 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references