On the Phenomenological Investigations into the Psychology of Dreaming

Philosophy International Journal 6 (3):1-6 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1900 the publication of the book, Interpretation of Dreams by Sigmund Freud raised very seminal and fascinating questions in the disciplines of psychology and psychoanalysis. Sigmund Freud’s intellectual contributions and the discovery of unconscious had given a big jolt to all the classical approaches, shook the disciplinary foundations of psychology and placed ‘psychoanalysis’ as an alternative model for understanding mental world. Psychologists across the world showed keen interest in uncovering the mysteries of dreams and dreaming. But the institutional dominance of Behaviorism and its standards of research didn’t allow them to cross the boundaries of conventional psychology. Behavioristic psychologists raised important questions on the methodology adopted by Sigmund Freud and leveled criticism against his unverifiable explanations. Behaviorism branded his theories as absolute subjectivist and unscientific. Hence, most of the psychologists were silent and systematically marginalized dream research and banished the discourses on dreams in the institutions of higher learning and research. The nineteenth century saw the emergence of the first dream studies, which were primarily concerned with dream phenomenology. Nevertheless, the pace of methodical dream research was held considerably by the emergence of distinct psychological movements at the start of the 20th century: behaviorism, classical psychoanalysis, and gestalt psychology, placed greater stress on the significance and meaning of dreams, as well as what they symbolized in the lives of individuals. Also a few of them questioned the reality of dreams and other similar mental experiences. Consequently, every movement undermined the greater sample sizes and more methodical research on dreams in its own unique manner. While presenting the views of Sigmund Freud, John Watson, Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, and Fritz Perls this paper makes an attempt to show how classical schools of psychology slowed down the flow of systematic dream studies with large samples.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freudian psychoanalysis in the work of Arthur Schnitzler Eyes Wide Shut.Aleksandra Janowska - 2023 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Germanica 17:125-134.
The riddle of dreams.Nadav Matalon - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (4):517 - 536.
Cultural Perspectives on Dreams and Consciousness.Douglass Price-Williams - 1994 - Anthropology of Consciousness 5 (3):13-16.
Introduction: philosophy and psychoanalysis.James Hopkins - 1982 - In Richard Wollheim & James Hopkins, Philosophical Essays on Freud. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-27

Downloads
29 (#842,532)

6 months
5 (#826,666)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sudhakar Venukapalli
Osmania University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references