Fragility and indestructibility of the tree property

Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):635-645 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We prove various theorems about the preservation and destruction of the tree property at ω2. Working in a model of Mitchell [9] where the tree property holds at ω2, we prove that ω2 still has the tree property after ccc forcing of size \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\aleph_1}$$\end{document} or adding an arbitrary number of Cohen reals. We show that there is a relatively mild forcing in this same model which destroys the tree property. Finally we prove from a supercompact cardinal that the tree property at ω2 can be indestructible under ω2-directed closed forcing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strong tree properties for two successive cardinals.Laura Fontanella - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):601-620.
Mathias forcing and ultrafilters.Janusz Pawlikowski & Wojciech Stadnicki - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (7-8):857-865.
Strongly unbounded and strongly dominating sets of reals generalized.Michal Dečo - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (7-8):825-838.
Creature forcing and large continuum: the joy of halving.Jakob Kellner & Saharon Shelah - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1-2):49-70.
Coherent trees that are not Countryman.Yinhe Peng - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (3-4):237-251.
A null ideal for inaccessibles.Sy-David Friedman & Giorgio Laguzzi - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (5-6):691-697.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
56 (#380,897)

6 months
3 (#1,467,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The tree property up to אω+1.Itay Neeman - 2014 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (2):429-459.
Fragility and indestructibility II.Spencer Unger - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (11):1110-1122.
The tree property below ℵ ω ⋅ 2.Spencer Unger - 2016 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 167 (3):247-261.
Specializing trees and answer to a question of Williams.Mohammad Golshani & Saharon Shelah - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 21 (1):2050023.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
Set theory.Thomas Jech - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic.
Constructibility.Keith J. Devlin - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):864-867.
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.

View all 8 references / Add more references