The tree property up to אω+1

Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (2):429-459 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/jsl.2013.25

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Itay Neeman. Aronszajn trees and failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 9, no. 1 , pp. 139–157. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property at אּω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 1 , pp. 279–290. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable cofinality. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 51, no. 5-6 , pp. 553–562. - Dima Sinapova. The tree property and the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at אּω2. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 3 , pp. 934–946. - Spencer Unger. Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 52, no. 5-6 , pp. 483–496. - Itay Neeman. The tree property up to אּω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic. vol. 79, no. 2 , pp. 429–459. [REVIEW]James Cummings - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):188-192.
Reviewed Work: Recent papers on the tree property. Aronszajn trees and failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 9, no. 1 , The tree property at ℵ ω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 1 , The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable confinality. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 51, no. 5-6 , The tree property and the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at [image]. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 77, no. 3 , Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 52, no. 5-6 , The tree property up to ℵ ω+1. Journal of Symbolic Logic. vol. 79, no. 2 by Itay Neeman; Dima Sinapova; Spencer Unger. [REVIEW]Review by: James Cummings - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):188-192.
Destructibility of the tree property at אω+1.Yair Hayut & Menachem Magidor - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-10.
Antonio Montalbán, Indecomposable linear orderings and hyperarithmetic analysis. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 6 (2006), no. 1, pp. 89–120. - Itay Neeman, The strength of Jullien’s indecomposability theorem. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 8 (2008), no. 1, pp. 93–119. - Itay Neeman, Necessary use of induction in a reversal. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 76 (2011), no. 2, pp. 561–574. [REVIEW]Henry Towsner - 2014 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):366-368.
Some Results on Tight Stationarity, University of California, Los Angeles, USA, 2016. Supervised by Itay Neeman.William Chen - 2018 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 24 (2):198-199.
Itay Neeman. Forcing with sequences of models of two types. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 55 , pp. 265–298. [REVIEW]Dima Sinapova - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (3):339-341.
The tree property at the successor of a singular limit of measurable cardinals.Mohammad Golshani - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (1-2):3-25.
The strong tree property and the failure of SCH.Jin Du - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (7-8):867-875.
The Strong and Super Tree Properties at Successors of Singular Cardinals.William Adkisson - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):1251-1283.
SPFA by finite conditions.Moti Gitik & Menachem Magidor - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (5-6):649-661.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
23 (#928,616)

6 months
6 (#827,406)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Fragility and indestructibility of the tree property.Spencer Unger - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):635-645.
Fragility and indestructibility II.Spencer Unger - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (11):1110-1122.
A model of Cummings and Foreman revisited.Spencer Unger - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (12):1813-1831.
The tree property below ℵ ω ⋅ 2.Spencer Unger - 2016 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 167 (3):247-261.
The special Aronszajn tree property.Mohammad Golshani & Yair Hayut - 2019 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (1):2050003.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
Aronszajn trees on ℵ2 and ℵ3.Uri Abraham - 1983 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 24 (3):213-230.
Aronszajn trees and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Itay Neeman - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):139-157.
Fragility and indestructibility of the tree property.Spencer Unger - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):635-645.

View all 6 references / Add more references