Understanding and the Norm of Explanation

Philosophia 43 (4):1171-1175 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I propose and defend the hypothesis that understanding is the norm of explanation. On this proposal, an explanation should express understanding. I call this the understanding account of explanation. The understanding account is supported by social and introspective observations. It is also supported by the relationship between knowledge and understanding, on the one hand, and assertion and explanation, on the other.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-10

Downloads
591 (#46,362)

6 months
146 (#30,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge.
Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism.Peter K. Unger - 1975 - Oxford [Eng.]: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):105-116.
The nature of explanation.Peter Achinstein - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references