Foundations and Philosophy

Philosophers' Imprint 18 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Univalent Foundations of mathematics take the point of view that all of mathematics can be encoded in terms of spatial notions like "point" and "path". We will argue that this new point of view has important implications for philosophy, and especially for those parts of analytic philosophy that take set theory and first-order logic as their benchmark of rigor. To do so, we will explore the connection between foundations and philosophy, outline what is distinctive about the logic of the Univalent Foundations, and then describe new philosophical theses one can express in terms of this new logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,902

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foundations of Philosophy. [REVIEW]Bernard Wuellner - 1950 - New Scholasticism 24 (2):204-205.
Foundations of Philosophy.D. O’Donoghue - 1954 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 4:136-137.
Foundations and Philosophy of Mathematics in Warsaw, the School of Andrzej Mostowski and Philosophy.Marcin Mostowski - 2018 - In Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska & Ángel Garrido (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School. Past and Present. Cham, Switzerland: Springer- Birkhauser,. pp. 555-565.
Neuropsychological Foundations of Philosophy.Patrick Suppes - 2009 - In Alexander Hieke & Hannes Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction: Between the Mind and the Brain. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. pp. 137-176.
Foundations of Philosophy. [REVIEW]Thomas J. Owens - 1952 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 27 (3):472-472.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-07

Downloads
192 (#127,337)

6 months
9 (#464,038)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hans Halvorson
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Mathematics and Metaphilosophy.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
A meaning explanation for HoTT.Dimitris Tsementzis - 2020 - Synthese 197 (2):651-680.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Towards a Philosophy of Real Mathematics.David Corfield - 2003 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Homotopy theoretic models of identity types.Steve Awodey & Michael Warren - 2009 - Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 146:45–55.

Add more references