The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committees in Belgium

Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):318-321 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ethics committees are the most important practical instrument of clinical ethics in Belgium and fulfil three tasks: the ethical review of experimental protocols, advising on the ethical aspects of healthcare practice, and ethics consultation. In this article the authors examine the current situation of ethics committees in Belgium from the perspective of clinical ethics. Firstly, the most important steps which thus far have been taken in Belgium are examined. Secondly, recent opinion by the Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics with regard to ethics committees is presented and the activities of Belgian ethics committees are discussed. Finally, the option to bring research ethics and clinical ethics under the roof of just one committee is criticised using a pragmatic and a methodological argument. Concomitantly, the authors build an argument in favour of the further development of ethics consultation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Clinical trials: two neglected ethical issues.A. Herxheimer - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):211-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
31 (#727,171)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Clinical Medical Ethics.Mark Siegler, Edmund D. Pellegrino & Peter A. Singer - 1990 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 1 (1):5-9.
Research ethics committees: A regional approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.
European Experiences of Ethics Committees.Verena Tschudin - 2001 - Nursing Ethics 8 (2):142-151.
Law-Making, Ethics and Hastiness.Tom Meulenbergs & Paul Schotsmans - 2002 - Ethical Perspectives 9 (2):86-95.

View all 6 references / Add more references