Reassessing the Reliability of Advance Directives

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):325 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A competent patient has the right to refuse treatment necessary to sustain life. However, for many end-of-life decisions, we lack direct access to the wishes of a competent patient. Some treatment decisions near the end of life involve patients with severely diminished mental capacity, some involve patients who are unable to communicate, and some involve patients who are simply unable or unwilling to participate in decisionmaking due to the nature or severity of their illness

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Patient Informed Choice for Altruism.David J. Doukas & John Hardwig - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (4):397-402.
When Any Answer Is a Good Answer: A Mandated-Choice Model for Advance Directives.Jacob Appel - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):417-421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
58 (#372,249)

6 months
10 (#423,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Living wills and substituted judgments: A critical analysis.Jos V. M. Welie - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):169-183.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ulysses and the Sirens.Jon Elster - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1):82-95.
Practical Reason and Norms.C. H. Whiteley - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (104):287-288.
Advance directives and the personal identity problem.Allen Buchanan - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (4):277-302.
The Many Faces of Competency.James F. Drane - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 15 (2):17-21.

View all 11 references / Add more references