When Any Answer Is a Good Answer: A Mandated-Choice Model for Advance Directives

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):417-421 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Approximately one in three American adults has executed a living will or healthcare declaration stating personal preferences regarding medical treatment in the event that he or she becomes terminally ill and unable to communicate. This figure stands in striking contrast to the 90% of Americans who, when asked, express specific wishes regarding their choice of care under such circumstances. Congress attempted to increase the number of Americans with advance directives when it passed the Patient Self Determination Act in 1990, billed at the time as the “Miranda Warning” of medicine, which requires hospitals and nursing homes receiving federal funds both to inform patients of their right to refuse life-sustaining care and to record all written directive in patients’ charts

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reassessing the Reliability of Advance Directives.Thomas May - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):325.
Unanswered Questions Surrounding the Patient Self–Determination Act.Robyn Shapiro - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (2):117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
147 (#154,289)

6 months
14 (#233,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references