Ethical issues in livestock cloning

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):197-217 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although cloning may eventually become an important technology for livestock production, four ethical issues must be addressed before the practice becomes widespread. First, researchers must establish that the procedure is not detrimental to the health or well-being of affected animals. Second, animal research institutions should evaluate the net social benefits to livestock producers by weighing the benefits to producers against the opportunity cost of research capacity lost to biomedical projects. Third, scientists should consider the indirect effects of cloning research on the larger ethical issues surrounding human cloning. Finally, the market structure for products of cloned animals should protect individual choice, and should recognize that many individuals find the prospect of cloning (or consuming cloned animals) repugnant. Analysis of these four issues is complicated by spurious arguments alleging that cloning will have a negative impact on environment and genetic diversity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Send in the clones ... Don't bother, they 're here'.B. Rollin - 1997 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (1):25-40.
Biomedical ethics.Roman Espejo (ed.) - 2003 - San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
92 (#229,027)

6 months
10 (#413,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul B. Thompson
Michigan State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Send in the clones ... Don't bother, they 're here'.B. Rollin - 1997 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (1):25-40.

Add more references