Attributed talent is a powerful myth

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):427-427 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whereas the reality of “innate talent” is questioned by the authors, the role of “attributed talent” is not discussed fully. “Attributed talent” is the imputation of high, not yet unfolded ability to an individual. Only if talent is attributed to a novice will resources be invested in the development of expertise. An alternative for estimating future achievement is discussed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fruitless polarities.Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):411-411.
Absurd environmentalism.Douglas K. Detterman, Lynne T. Gabriel & Joanne M. Ruthsatz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):411-412.
Defining and finding talent: Data and a multiplicative model?Dean Keith Simonton - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):424-425.
Innate talents: Reality or myth?Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):399-407.
Natural born talents undiscovered.Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):432-437.
The rage to drink, or: Frontiers of expertise.Oliver Vitouch - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):428-429.
Inborn talent exists.Joan Freeman - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):415-415.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#398,246)

6 months
13 (#281,088)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references