Philosophical theories of privacy: Implications for an adequate online privacy policy

Metaphilosophy 38 (1):1–22 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay critically examines some classic philosophical and legal theories of privacy, organized into four categories: the nonintrusion, seclusion, limitation, and control theories of privacy. Although each theory includes one or more important insights regarding the concept of privacy, I argue that each falls short of providing an adequate account of privacy. I then examine and defend a theory of privacy that incorporates elements of the classic theories into one unified theory: the Restricted Access/Limited Control (RALC) theory of privacy. Using an example involving data-mining technology on the Internet, I show how RALC can help us to frame an online privacy policy that is sufficiently comprehensive in scope to address a wide range of privacy concerns that arise in connection with computers and information technology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
KDD, data mining, and the challenge for normative privacy.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):265-273.
Unknowableness and Informational Privacy.David Matheson - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:251-267.
New Ways of Thinking about Privacy.B. Roessler - 2006 - In Anne Philips Bonnie Honig & John Dryzek (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 694-713.
Privacy by Design in Personal Health Monitoring.Anders Nordgren - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (2):148-164.
Privacy.William A. Edmundson - 2004 - In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 271–283.
The Internet and Privacy.Carissa Veliz - 2019 - In David Edmonds (ed.), Ethics and the Contemporary World. New York: Routledge. pp. 149-159.
19 Privacy and/in the Public Sphere.Beate Roessler - 2016 - Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2016 (1):243-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,995 (#3,333)

6 months
182 (#19,346)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

In Defense of (Some) Online Echo Chambers.Douglas R. Campbell - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (3):1-11.
Defining privacy.Adam Moore - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (3):411-428.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Why privacy is important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
The right to privacy.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):295-314.
Privacy, morality, and the law.W. A. Parent - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (4):269-288.
Towards a theory of privacy in the information age.James H. Moor - 1997 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 27 (3):27-32.

View all 21 references / Add more references