Was Bosanquet a Hegelian?

Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 31:39-60 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

reprint Sweet, William (1995) "Was Bosanquet a Hegelian?". Hegel Bulletin 16(1):39-60

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Naturalized Historicism And Hegelian Ethics.T. Pinkard - 1992 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 25:18-33.
Collingwood's Reform Of Hegelian Dialectic.R. Peters - 1995 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 31:90-105.
The Hesitant Hegelian: Collingwood, Hegel And Inter-War Oxford.James Connelly - 2005 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 51:57-73.
Antigone: towards a Hegelian feminist philosophy.Kimberly Hutchings - 2000 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 41:120-131.
W Sweet's Idealism And Rights: The Social Ontology Of Human Rights In The Political Thought Of Bernard Bosanquet. [REVIEW]P. Nicholson - 1998 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 37:100-103.
R Pippin's Idealism As Modernism. Hegelian Variations. [REVIEW]Katerina Deligiorgi - 1999 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 39:108-111.
The "Unhappy Consciousness" And Conscious Unhappiness: On Adorno's Critique Of Hegel And The Idea Of A Hegelian Critique Of Adorno.S. Jarvis - 1994 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 29:71-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
1 (#1,946,451)

6 months
1 (#1,891,450)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Sweet
St. Francis Xavier University

Citations of this work

Bernard Bosanquet.William Sweet - 2008; 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references