Engaging the normative question in the H5N1 avian influenza mutation experiments

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 8:12 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent time there has been ample discussion concerning censorship of research conducted in two labs involved in avian influenza virus research. Much of the debate has centered on the question whether the methods and results should reach to open disclosure given the “dual use” nature of this research which can be used for nefarious purposes

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

H5N1 Avian Flu Research and the Ethics of Knowledge.David B. Resnik - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (2):22-33.
Risk to Human Health Posed by Avian Influenza.Anne Moates - 2005 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 11 (2):1.
Pandemic Influenza Planning and Response in India, 1949-2009.Rhyddhi Chakraborty & Chhanda Chakraborti - 2015 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 25 (1):7-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-07

Downloads
99 (#213,049)

6 months
20 (#145,561)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis.Michael J. Selgelid - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):923-964.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Future contingents and relative truth.John MacFarlane - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):321–336.

View all 6 references / Add more references